Spark Of Life Media

November 25, 2008

9/11 MAVs ?


http://angelsfortruth.com/Military%20Orbs.html

The Micro Air Vehicle (MAV) Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) developed a
backpackable, fully autonomous, vertically launched-and-landed ducted fan UAV capable of
providing electro-optical or infrared hover-and-stare support to the dismounted Soldier.
The MAV air vehicle is small (less than 14-inch duct outer diameter), flies autonomously,
has an endurance of 55 minutes at sea level, and can operate at altitudes over 10,000 feet.
These capabilities make it ideal for operations in the complex/urban terrain and extreme
conditions typical of restricted military environments.
http://www.darpa.mil/Docs/DARPA2007Strateg…inalMarch14.pdf

Knowing how the U S Government violates privacy laws using the excuse of “security”,
what caught my attention is that Honeywell markets their MAV for urban civilian use as well.
http://www.honeywell.com/sites/aero/Surfac…8CBB5BDECF7.htm

So when will Nano Air Vehicles be spying on us?

DARPA NANO AIR VEHICLE PROGRAM
The objectives of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Nano Air
Vehicle (NAV) program are to develop and demonstrate an extremely small (less than 7.5 cm
wingspan), ultra-lightweight (weighing less than 10 grams) air vehicle system with the potential
to perform indoor and outdoor military missions in challenging environments.
The initial 18-month phase of the program ended in spring of 2008. During the first
phase, four contractors, AeroVironment Inc., Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Lockheed Martin
Advanced Technology Laboratories, and MicroPropulsion Corp., developed technologies for lift
generation and vehicle control via rotating and flapping wings, advanced stability and control
using video images, and analytical tools for developing low Reynolds number aircraft. The
contractors also conducted trade studies, risk mitigation testing and demonstrations, and
completed preliminary designs of their vehicle concepts.

Based on the results of the initial phase, DARPA selected AeroVironment to continue
developing its Nano Air Vehicle design. The continuing design effort by AeroVironment, which
will be completed in less than six months, will focus on further development of critical aspects of
their flapping wing concept. If this additional development work is successful, DARPA will
start an 18-month detailed design effort that will conclude with prototype system fabrication and
flight demonstrations.

“The NAV program will push the limits of aerodynamic and power conversion
efficiency, endurance and maneuverability for very small air vehicle systems,” explained Dr.
Todd Hylton, DARPA program manager. “We are interested in a system that has 20 minutes of
flight time, can withstand 2.5 meters per second wind gusts, can operate inside buildings and
have up to a kilometer command and control range.” In addition, the vehicle would be able to
hover and deliver a two-gram payload inside a building.

(Biological warfare? Two grams of weaponized anthrax have been shown to contain as many
as two trillion spores which, theoretically, could cause about 200 million deaths. Dr. Todd Hylton
is the DARPA Nano Air Vehicle project manager. He is also project manager for the Self
Decontaminating Surfaces Program and the Biological Sensory Structure Emulation Program.)

DARPA NANO AIR VEHICLE PROGRAM- May 2008
http://www.arpa.mil/Docs/NAV_fact_sheet_Ma…07180945041.pdf

Todd Hylton, Ph.D.
http://www.darpa.mil/dso/personnel/hylton.htm

AmandaReconWith
http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=5690&view=findpost&p=15295010

Advertisements

9/11 – SIMCITY 2001 Virtual Reality.

TV’s 9/11 simulated lanscapes of Manhattan were necessary to control all aspects of the real-life events unfolding – and not only the ‘planecrash’ scenes. The ‘explosive-rigged towers’ might have popped here and there and that would not have been good for TV viewers to see. The moving backgrounds/foregrounds, etc… are only a part of the many tell-tale signs of the manipulations going on. One may wish to focus only on the most blatant proof of video doctoring and just go with an Occam’s razor exposé. After all, the planecrash shots are by now ALL proven fakes. The layering issue may not be as blatant or as easily grasped as the various color schemes, maskings and swiveling choppers with static backdrops – but it certainly merits due attention. Let me provide a few samples – judge for yourself…

Frames from SEPTEMBER CLUES H

The two shots below are from FOX and NBC. Before even thinking ‘perspectives’, one has to keep in mind these are two rival TV Networks. What odds for them to have such similar vantage points ?

The next two shots are from FOX and ABC. Again, before even thinking ‘perspectives’, one has to keep in mind these are two rival TV Networks. What odds for them to have such similar vantage points ?

The next two frames are from ABC during the 1st tower collapse – only seconds apart (the entire backdrop is seen moving pretty swiftly on video, laterally AND vertically).

The next two shots are courtesy of the BBC, broadcast just as you see them in the frame below : two videos side by side: one yellow and the other black/white… Note the Verrazzano bridge in the background, considerably different in size and position – at the same moment in time – and hardly from very diverse camera angles…

The CNN broadcasts – which featured no helicopter shots (mostly only Aaron Brown reporting from a ‘rooftop’) – didn’t show us the Jersey shore backdrop at all ! This was probably a ‘wise’ idea as it could have provided a static basis of comparison which might have exposed the FOX/NBC/ABC ‘chopper’ shots and their various perspective problems.

Below, Simon compares a (low-res) TOURIST PICTURE with a CNN shot
It is unlikely that any difference in vantage point (height) would account for the Jersey shore to disappear completely on CNN. Judge by yourself.

Let us keep focused on what, IMHO, the main questions of this debate should be :
(1) : “Are the 9/11 live broadcasts otherwise normal footage with animation planes added on top”
or

(2) : “Are the 9/11 live broadcasts for the most part composed with digital renderings of the landscape”

Simon’s reasoning for ruling out hypothesis (1) is :

– no satisfactory explanation for the various ‘pastel’ color schemes. Top range broadcast cameras have ISO standard automatic white balance settings for daylight conditions.

– no satisfactory explanation for the plastic, cartoon-like texture of the landscapes conspicuously evident even in the highest archive resolution footage available.

– no satisfactory explanation for the ‘mask linings’ seen around buildings in a wide range of shots. No explanation for observed black/transparent ghost contours.

– at least 4 newschoppers were allegedly in the air, yet all seem to be hovering roughly in the same area (views almost always from Northern vantage points). The few shots we have (ABC) of a chopper sweepingly circling and filming from South never catches any of the other choppers supposedly hovering in the airspace North of the towers.

– virtually all choppers seen in the 9/11 broadcasts simply zap by at sustained speed from one side of the screen to the other. No newschoppers, to be sure…

– some of the alleged NBC chopper shots have the towers swaying alarmingly, causing TV anchors to wonder aloud if the towers are leaning… That pendulum movement is precisely what gyroscopic cameras are designed to impede.

-some of the alleged ABC chopper shots show the chopper landing gear rotating in front of camera lens while the NY scenery remains perfectly static.

– perspective problems with foregrounds/backgrounds (and disappearing backdrops) not reasonably explainable by cinematic dollyzoom special effects. Newschoppers are supposed to and will film aerial sceneries in normal fashion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolly_zoom

There’s much more one could add to this list of observations, but let’s try an Occam’s razor-style argumentation to rationalize the entire issue :

WHAT ODDS FOR 4 MAJOR (rival) TV NETWORKS TO FEATURE AERIAL/ROOFTOP VIEWS, ALL STRIKINGLY SIMILAR BUT FOR THEIR (bizarre) COLOR SCHEMES ?

NBC aerial view of Manhattan

ABC aerial view of Manhattan

FOX

CNN rooftop view of Manhattan

In the light of these observations, hypothesis (2) appears to be the most reasonable and logical conclusion :

The 9/11 live broadcasts were composed with digital renderings of the landscape – in all likelyhood by a central command / TV op-centre such as : http://www.scl.cc

Color schemes were tweaked to convey the illusion of ‘diversity’ between (what was meant to represent) the images of 5 major TV networks.

-The NBC TV archive shot is 14 seconds before the 2nd strike.
-The “In Memoriam” shot’s timeline is unknown – but we’ll soon see why it doesn’t matter.

We have 4 boats. Let’s give them names :
A = Ace
B= Bob
C= Cargo
J = Jolly

Now as you can see, the “In Memoriam” shot shows Bob quite a bit further ahead while Cargo and Jolly disappear from view. So far, so good. We may assume the 14 seconds to the 2nd strike are now down to X (?) seconds.

The problem is…we also have the infamous, non-archive, home-recorded NBC shot (which hardly shows anything at all – only a fuzzy streak diving into the tower). But as the exit hole explodes, this is what we observe : Ace – Bob – Cargo & Jolly are all there ! Note their respective positions.

Of particular and crucial interest is that Cargo is in a position where it certainly should be visible in the “Memoriam” shot. But it is not. It’s long gone.

So how did that happen ? Anyone familiar with video (or audio) multitrack editing will know how easily tracks may slip out of synch (with each other) if you’re moving markers on a set timeline. The “In Memoriam” docu was likely a re-edit of old material used on 9/11. They ran the background images ‘faster’ than the foreground images (buildings) – which have also been rotated more than the originals : As a matter of fact, that particular angle of view (slightly more to the left of the towers) was NEVER SEEN on 9/11 and is nowhere to be seen in the NBC archives. All this may seem complex to the layman but unfortunately that is what all this research is about. Blood sweat and tears .

FOXED OUT part2 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9LURV-joLI
( the “JIM and BOB” comparison towards the end of the video)

If you want to read up on how fake imagery is morphed together, you can do that in the Air Force’s seminal Information Warfare paper by Stein.

http://ics.leeds.ac.uk/papers/vp01.cfm?outfit=pmt&folder=66&paper=493

The backdrop was removed from some of the 9-11 videos shown on TV. That’s a proven fact. Why was it removed? To hide evidence…

Many of the “boats” and “helicopters” and “birds” and “people” and “helicopter skis” are just art assets that the perps overlaid onto other images. They’re not any different from the monsters running back and forth on screen in a video game.

Many of the 9-11 videos are montages of various elements. It’s the most common type of fakery around. Read “The Commissar Vanishes”. These days, the montage process has even been automated and commercialized.

http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1400181.1400202&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE


http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html#MSNBC_Live

Notice the weird “wobbling” in this short video clip gif as it pans to the left as the “plane” is seen flying down before disappearing behind the WTC before the feed is switched to a different angle.

Full video show more “wobbling” and “zoom clues”:





– all 5 depict the same moment in time
– all 5 are full-frontal views of the twin towers
– all 5 are set in different sceneries – and vastly different colors
– all 5 are, consequently, shot from 5 different cameras
– all 5 are thus aligned on the same axis, whether they be shot

from helicopters, rooftops or, as some folks want to explain it,
“a much lower vantage point” (Matrix number 1…)

– 4 out of the 5 show a minuscule blob passing between the towers – which is not ‘falling debris’ as stated in the Anthony Lawson/Nick Irving debunking efforts of the first version of Sept Clues. I have shown that the blob is synched to the ‘airplane’ motion.

You may not rate Simon Shack as a serious researcher and He does not want to be wasting anyone’s ‘precious time’. However, as a man of common sense, Simon asks us to use our own judgement to explain to how these 5 shots may have occured in the Real World.

YURI FAKTOROVICH is a russian pilot who purportedly flew by the 9/11 crime scene (North to South) in his little Cessna aircraft.

Grabbing his camera (this is how the official story goes), this is what he shot through his window as he approached Manhattan :

As we crop YURI’s picture, we get this pretty familiar view : a coincidence, of course.
(Note the Verrazzano bridge, always perfectly aligned…)

But our friend YURI also shot 3 more pictures as he drove his little Cessna past the 9/11 crime scene..

Funnily enough, his last picture failed to capture any of the many TV choppers filming the crime scene…Oh wait, maybe your fine eye will FIND ONE !

THE 9/11 ABC broadcast (btw 8:53 and 9:12AM)

ABC’s broadcast starts off with this watercolor view of the towers. Now let’s assume for now these are all REAL images taken from ABC’s Chopper7. All right ?
ABC at 8:53

ABC at 8:54 ( This tripod shot from East is briefly aired a couple of times)

ABC at 8:58 : Chopper 7 catches one of several choppers seen in the 9/11 broadcasts which almost invariably zap by as if they had some more urgent matters to tend to…

ABC at 8:59 : Chopper7 is now proceeding in southwestern direction around the towers ( its gyroscopic camera evidently, shall we say, malfunctioning…)

ABC at 9:00 Chopper 7 is now full west of the WTC : it catches another chopper, perhaps the only slowly hovering chopper that we may find on all the 5 TV networks that morning. Hey, could it be NBC’s Chopper 4 ?..

ABC at 9:01 : Chopper 7 is now south of the towers (still on the western side).

ABC at 9:02 : Now – in less than a minute – Chopper7 is back northwest of the towers (which get locked into position to prepare for the cartoon strike).

At roughly the same time, another camera locks into position (see picture at right) only seconds before the ‘airplane’ strike.

ABC at 9:03 : Airliner animation zaps by and disappears behind towers.

ABC at 9:03+ : Chopper 7’s camera (awkwardly placed between the well-focused ‘legs’ of the chopper) slickly ‘pulls’ the towers into center of picture. No doubt, a camera with many special features…

ABC at 9:05 : Now, chopper 7’s camera pulls off another trick : its gyroscopic system actually compensates for the direction changes of its carrier! One could also applaud the depth of field of the camera which focuses with ease both close-up and distant fields.

ABC at 9:08 : Chopper7 is now back to a (north-westerly) airspace much nearer to the towers than a few minutes ago. Those chopper skids still getting in the way…although in a less annoying manner. The image is darker than ever.

ABC at 9:08 + : Now this is when things start to get interesting : the live TV feed abruptly switches from the dark shot to another bright-green, washed-out image which seems to be from another chopper altogether. Did ABC have not one, but TWO choppers in the air ? This is not a replay – nothing in the broadcast suggests this is meant to be anything else than continuous and unedited live footage.

ABC at 9:09 : After a while, the bright-green shot (from a chopper clearly in another position) switches back again to the darker images of chopper7 … or which is which ? What’s going on ?

ABC at 9:12 : Finally, we are graced with this infamous shot.
Compare it to the colors and brightness of the 1st picture at 8:53…

Please note : Chopper 7 at NO time leaves the western/north-western area of the scenery. How YURI FAKTOROVICH (see previous post in this thread) failed to catch NBC’s Chopper4, ABC’s Chopper7 (or the phantom 2nd ABC chopper) as he flew by in his Cessna is quite a mystery…

Conclusions : the burden of proof lies with those who claim these are authentic images filmed by TV choppers. We now understand more about the 9/11 plan : it was principally based around a media-backed mass illusion. Along a logical line of reasoning, we can reach to a conclusion dictated by plain, deductive common sense : little or no parts of the real-life events were supposed to be aired on television. It was way too great a risk – and a rather silly one to take given the means and technology available. We are looking at computer-generated imagery. By definition, such images are not real – they are false.

TWO FAST FLY-BY CHOPPERS IN THE HAZE

The Russian Cessna pilot ‘YURI FAKTOROVICH’, by contrast, offered us some of the best resolution pictures of the crime scene available. If choppers were hovering around the place , they would certainly be visible. But there’s none.
Now let’s have another look at Yuri’s first and last (of 4) pictures :

YURI’S SHOT ARRIVING AT THE SCENE ( about 9:01 ?)

YURI’S SHOT DEPARTING THE SCENE ( about 9:04 ? )

In my ABC chronology 8:53 – 9:12 (see my previous post) I have showed that ABC’s ‘Chopper7’ hovers southwest of the towers at 9:01 . Chopper7 never leaves the west-northwest-southwest airspace around the towers. If it is 5 miles away – as you say – ‘Chopper7’ should certainly not be hidden by the smoke…

Now, as you must know (if you’ve done your homework as a serious researcher), NBC’s ‘Chopper4’ filmed ‘Flight175’s crash with an almost head-on view of the towers, after which it started drifting westwards too. Here it is at around 9:06. Does it look like a shot taken from 5 miles away ? Note that ‘remarkable’, superfast zoom-in just as that chopper-skid again swishes in front of the camera … ( The shot on the right is the direct continuation of the sequence, just to show that what obscures the camera is indeed the chopper skid…)

NBC at around 9:06

The ‘beauty’ of this research is that we can use our own eyes to make progress towards determining whether what we were shown on Tv on 9/11 was real or not.

Let us check out what happened around the collapse of WTC2.
We will compare a clip from the Camera Planet archives with a clip from NBC.

-Clip at left is from CameraPlanet at the time of the WTC2 collapse :

-Clip at right is a replay from NBC (Matt Lauer’s voiceover goes : “Don’t know if this is the correct tape…”)

Of course, these GIF files Simon is posting here are small : I hope you will take his word for the fact that the chopper seen on CameraPlanet (which takes a Northwestern direction at start of collapse) is not seen at anytime on NBC (on my fullscreen, high-res version).

Now, let’s see who have released these 2 clips :

This is the ‘mission statement’ of the CameraPlanet archive :
http://video.google.com/911anniversary.html

“What began as a search for footage for a single film has turned into a world-wide resource for filmmakers, historians, and scientists. The CameraPlanet Archive is the world’s largest single collection of video recorded on and around attacks on the World Trade Center.”

NBC is one of the major US TV networks and as such, I believe, needs no introduction…

So, I ask you : who are you going to call to ask for a clarification : NBC or CameraPlanet ? Both ? Should we wait for Shure aka Jeff Hill to do this for us or are we going to do something about it ?

We are not looking for a BLACK chopper that flies BEHIND the smoke BEFORE the collapse (and disappears thereafter) such as the one you posted :

We are looking for a WHITE chopper that flies IN FRONT of the towers (and well clear of the smoke) AFTER the collapse.

Besides, if we are to apply the wondrous “911 TV footage chromatic standards” to your black chopper, it should turn white if it flew in front of the smoke !…

Chopper2 apparently shot the WTC2 collapse from south. FOX5 apparently aired that shot too :

Here’s what is said in the CBS studio : Over 30seconds after the collapse, JIM SMITH (who apparently is inside Chopper2) reports : “…..it appears that the top portion of the building has collapsed down to the streets below…”

http://www.septclues.com/CBS%20chopper2%20…JIM%20SMITH.aif

Now , yet again, it’s anyone’s guess where Chopper2 might be in these pictures…

Jim Smith is one of at least four TV people who report “…the top portion of the building has collapsed” – sometimes long after it is evident the whole tower has been blown to fine dust.

Something flew out the other side, this is what they were trying to hide.

-SparkOfLife/SimonShack

November 6, 2008

Truth in 7 Minutes – Election Chat w/ Markus Allen

Nov 4th/2008 – Truth in 7 Minutes – Election Chat w/ Markus Allen

Truth In 7 Minutues.com

November 4, 2008

Systematic Demolition of WTC (exo-nuke + DEW thesis)

September 25, 2008

The Counter-Culture Cult of Truth. Leary, Lennon & The CIA

The first in-depth analysis done by quote unquote reporters on the 7/7 attacks in England was done by a man claiming to be ex-British intelligence. His name was David Shayler and the film was called ‘Mind The Gap’

Shayler also came out on Sky News in may of 2005 and claimed that the videos shown on 9/11 had impossibilities in them referring to the ‘melting’ of airplanes. This is easily one of the first main-stream references to ‘TV-FAKERY.’ Oddly enough, Alex Jones had him on the InfoWars show a few weeks later and congratulated him on ‘the long segment of truthing on the news,’ Whether or not Alex brought up the ‘melting’ of planes is a different story.

More recently Shayler has become outspoken on ‘No Planes’ and even took on GCN Radio talk show host Jack Blood. Blood asked tough questions to the ‘former’ British MI5 agent. The interview can be heard here
What is most interesting is how people are perceiving Shayler’s words. In the description of this video it reads “Mr. Shayler suspiciously fronts the “No-Plane Theory” about 9/11 and claims to be the son of God.”

What this poster is referring to is a strange video of Shayler wearing white robes and making claims that he was of an advanced spiritual nature and that we were all destined ‘to evolve into gods.’
What he and his ‘partner’ Annie are back in England after they both claimed to be living in France and targeted by British police during their absence in the past few years. What is strange is how Shayler, after being so quiet has come back more outspoken (and weird) than ever before. Shayler has seemed to have gone out of his way to make himself look crazy, it is without a doubt discrediting all of his information involving MI5 and MI6, this is how things in the secret service work. Once you are apart of the intelligence community you are always apart of it, people may go with a big lie program all their life.
David Shayler is a total fraud. By declaring himself as the Messiah and soon after embracing TV fakery, he handed the “No Planes is Disinformation” crowd a victory. Not to mention the fact he’s a former agent of MI5, yet he doesn’t present us with any new smoking gun information. A real whistle blower who was dangerous to the perpetrators would be either completely free-zed out of both the mainstream and alternative medias or killed. He also makes easy-to-discredit statements like “Now witnesses at the Pentagon have reported that a smaller plane fired a missile into the building”. No eyewitnesses have said this. Shayler has done nothing for the real movement besides hand one over to the debunkers.

Shayler’s ‘jailing’ was designed to give him some initial street cred. He’s now designed to discredit No Planers. Ex-MI5 Yeah right? Well, some people will argue that he discussed the problem with melting planes before his spiritual shift. Well, that is even worse. He starts embracing TV fakery, causing some drooling ‘truthers’ to suspect he is ‘COINTELPRO’, then he hands a big victory over to those “No Planes is COINTELPRO” by suddenly saying that he is the Messiah, and even giving undecided folks some compelling evidence for the “No Planes is Disinfo” theory. This is a perfect example of the intelligence agencies of the world feeding cult like behaviour.

This type of work can be seen all throughout what is called the ‘alternative media’ even the main stream media with their neo-leftist commentary perpetuated by people who claim to be ‘former insiders’. Take Robert Baer for example. Baer is a ‘author’ and claims to be a ‘former’ case office at the Central Intelligence Agency. More interestingly Baer attended Jesuit Georgetown University School of Foreign Service in 1976 and joined the CIA’s Directorate of Operations as a case officer soon later. After his Twenty plus year career Baer supposedly hung up the black suit and became a best selling author. His first book was entitled ‘See No Evil: The True Story of a Ground Soldier in the CIA’s War on Terrorism’ The book talked about the corrupt nature of the CIA & U.S. Military stronghold during the beginning fazes of the Afghan war. Though Baer claims that the Military Industrial complex is blood thirsty and corrupt, he refuses to accept certain aspects of what the official story of 9/11 and the war on terror refuses to address.

In an interview with Thom Hartmann on June 9, 2006, Baer was asked if he believed “that there was an aspect of ‘inside job’ to 9/11 within the U.S. government”. He replied, “There is that possibility, the evidence points at it.” However, he later stated, “For the record, I don’t believe that the World Trade Center was brought down by our own explosives, or that a rocket, rather than an airliner, hit the Pentagon. I spent a career in the CIA trying to orchestrate plots, wasn’t all that good at it, and certainly couldn’t carry off 9/11. Nor could the real pros I had the pleasure to work with.”
It has become increasingly clear that this coudln’t be further from the truth. The CIA and other intelligence agencies around the world have had much practice covering up conspiracies. A multi-dimensional template, if you will. This has allowed the mass media, and alternative media to focus on the half truth while the real underground researchers sift through the b.s.

The fact is that once you are CIA, you are always CIA. You will never get out of the business unless that is apart of your operation, to get out of the business. Operation Mockingbird was a CIA project that started in the late 50s and was detailed in the the Church Committee investigation in 1975.

In 1977, Rolling Stone alleged that one of the most important journalists under the control of Operation Mockingbird was Joseph Alsop, whose articles appeared in over 300 different newspapers. Other journalists alleged by Rolling Stone Magazine to have been willing to promote the views of the CIA included Stewart Alsop (New York Herald Tribune), Ben Bradlee (Newsweek), James Reston (New York Times), Charles Douglas Jackson (Time Magazine), Walter Pincus (Washington Post), William C. Baggs (The Miami News), Herb Gold (The Miami News) and Charles Bartlett (Chattanooga Times). According to Nina Burleigh (A Very Private Woman), these journalists sometimes wrote articles that were commissioned by Frank Wisner. The CIA also provided them with classified information to help them with their work.

Timothy Leary a counter-culture drug-guru once observed the CNN show crossfire to be ‘The left wing of the CIA arguing with the Right,’ as it would turn out Leary couldn’t have been closer to the truth. Both Buchannan and Braden were Jesuit CIA assets These type of statements made Timothy Leary a idolized individual, but as most researchers will tell you. ‘Do not worship your idols or the topics of your research, because then you won’t see their flaws.’

Leary in the beginning years of his popularity was coming from a religious set and setting, mainly Buddhism, and Eastern religions. Though after his time in jail, Leary had a steep change of direction.

His earlier writings had been about seeing through the ‘plastic studio set’ reality/matrix and turning on tunin in and droppin out. Ie., not buying into their consumer-driven materialistic LIE, which is promoted via their mind control ‘education,’ This was the talk that made him the legend that he is today. But, after he came out of his jail sentence, he began expounding about ‘messages’ he got from ‘ETs’, and that our destiny as a species was to genetically mutate into all different forms of being, and to become immortal. Now THAT shit is the dream/plans of the sicko globalists, and their continuance of Eugenics, into Transhumanism!

Was this change natural or was he the victim of the supposed mind control technology the intelligence services are supposed to have. Where they can make it so you hear voices, etc? This could only be speculation. One may ask, Why would the CIA promote LSD use ? Doesn’t that seem ridiculous and redundant ?

Well, for a start, the CIA interest in psychedelic drugs was NOT to turn us onto Nature, and seeing through their plastic reality matrix–which is what psychedelics can do. No, what those control freaks wanted was controlled zombies. And they gave LSD, etc to UNSUSPECTING people. Again the control factor. Remember in the USA, Timothy Leary was a counter-culture guru and he pushed the LSD for his university professor position he wanted to hold on to as well as for his ‘handlers.’ Some people say Leary was a snitch to the FBI and when he was a lecturer at Harvard, he was closely allied with a Dr. Murray (man who invented addiction patch) and involved in “studies” where unwitting students, prisoners, and mental patients were given LSD and all sort of recipes from the CIA mind control folk. Could Leary have been the victim of these ‘studies’ without knowing it ?

I think we have enough anecdotal evidence over the last 20 years to know that the big British and US intelligence agencies are very much in to mind control and that they have several mind controlled people “working” for them. So many many of the people who are or once were well known for writing and speaking out against the new world order are found to be “ex” CIA and really still working for them. Books, videos, movie stars — so many of them. Remember Gloria Steinem became a Playboy Bunny at the Playboy Club because she also was working for the CIA in all her pushing of feminism. There are even some who say David Icke is sort of a property of the covert intelligence apparatus of Great Britain.

Do these mind control technologies exist? And if so, what are the signs ? Shaylar for example, in his recent incarnations on video appears to have lost about 100 pounds of weight, even in his flowing white robes. Weight loss apparent in his face too. He sort of have really faded from the talk radio scene. No one can say for sure if he is in the clutches of British covert intelligence apparatus, but his history certainly makes him a prime candidate. Maybe he just has gotten in to various kinds of drugs for his mind altering “new spirituality, and weight loss I might add.

Some people claim that Leary was knowingly spreading LSD throughout the country with his lectures, these people claim that LSD leaves people ‘fried’ and ‘emotionless’ though anyone who has experienced psychedelics will tell you that couldn’t be further from the truth. People talk about ‘putting chemicals into your brain’ and ‘damaging your body for spiritual escape’ These people see those of Leary and Lennon to end their lives on a ‘very ugly and nonspiritual looking status’ This in itself again, is a completely different story. You may ask yourself, Did John Lennon really know he was putting back masking messages into his songs ? Or was he ‘got at’ in Africa ?

In the case of ‘chemicals’ and ‘brain poison’ it is already scientifically proven that LSD has less effect on your brain and chromosomes then Aspartame and Caffeine. In fact, every time you eat food, and drink whatever beverage you like you are putting ‘chemicals into your brain.’ These people claiming LSD to be a tool of enslavement have no idea what it is meant by a ‘wonderful spiritual experience’ till these experience what that means for themselves. Talking blind, and using your judgmental tone is the very issue in this world, some people just can’t have an open mind. Who do THEY get THAT from?
And yes, of course your Bible forbids psychedelic plants and substances –at least ostensibly, – because your ‘God’ forbid any ‘gods’ but him! And this is big reason that Christian Bible-believers and pushers went into people’s lands and carried out genocide with anthrax blanket donations to Indigenous peoples. This is exact behaviour of Christians who imposed their sadistic will onto people who KNEW how to live with the land, and have good community. Do they not get that that attitude is control-freakery? If they used sacred psychedelic sacraments, the Christians would say that they were of the ‘Devil’. Because Christians are just AS totalitarian as the militaristic occultist elite and lackies, this is why people have said (of all generations) that pointing the finger at the control-freak elite is like the pot calling the kettle black! Utter hypocrisy. Because you(religious fanatics) want total control of people too, even of their very consciousness, and religious freedoms, and to partake of — what Indigenous tradition call ‘Sacred Medicine.’

What is ‘ugly and unspiritual looking’ is people who are totally alienated from Nature and their own sensuality dictate to others who are no, what they may consume as their sacred sacrament.

Name drop: elephant/room, Dachsie, zoomer & Lord Tsukasa

9/11 RESEARCH FORUM PUMPITOUT.COM DEACTIVATED

Someone got Jeff Hill good, Proboard’s has deleted ‘DJ SHURE’s’ forum. The only information they will give, is that it has been deleted for a TOS violation. They closed the thread Jeff made on their support forum and have deleted genghis’ thread after he inquired about it. As far as I’m concerned this is unfair and unacceptable.

INFO

pumpitout forum closed

board host

The Timing stinks.
It was immediately shut down in the same night after Nico Haupt plugged Shure long, loud and clearly on the Howard Stern Network Show ‘Total Penetration’ referring to the cameramen and photographer interviews and Shure’s investigative and ‘social engineering’ work.

On the same day Killtown’s videos were removed by Val as well..

This was a carefully co-ordinated assault not on pumpitout, not on Jeff Hill not on Killtown’s but on RESEARCH available to the public on the Internet, It is known because Val also removed a Jeff Hill video from many account.

Read more:
http://southeastasianews.org/evan_fairbanks_is_a_liar.html

In a phone call to Val directly the morning after this happened she knew about Jeff’s Forums but acted surprised. She also eluded to the fact that someone REPRESENTING her was taking down the videos on her behalf.

Although she refused to comment exactly who.

This was not about Genghis comments or Jeff’s content. This was a careful attack on access to 9-11 truth research.

Even the Proboard’s staff were deliberately suspiciously vague when dealing with Jeff’s Situation. It is not improbable to assume the order to remove came from an Agency or a Dept. within the US.

Something is definitely in the winds. And it’s not Alex Jones farts this time.

Thanks to:
shure
ewing2001
Nephilim70

Toronto Sky Anomalies – 9/11 holograms

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.