Spark Of Life Media

December 4, 2008

Mumbai TV-FAKERY ?

November 27, 2008

2012, The way of truth: an analysis of David Wilcock’s testimony.

Background

What the most expierenced people will tell you, the truth is a lie undiscovered. Those who claim to know it all, are the ones who are still very much asleep. The name of the game is deception, and it takes a long while to understand this. Those who do not grasp the true nature of the enemy shouldn’t bother themselves with the burden of fighting the battle, in fact, they shouldn’t even be on the battle field.

‘The truth is a riddle wrapped up in an enigma.’ A famous person once spoke these words in reference to the JFK assassination, and that is exactly what it was. Those new to the ‘game’ may not be fully aware of the reality that exists within the realm of ‘controlled opposition.’ In fact, it almost seems taboo in the ‘truth’ community to even bring up the idea that someone may be controlled opposition, it seems as though the ones that are controlled are making a concious effort not to allow people to become aware of counter intelligence.[1]


Yellow circle showing William Greer’s clenched left fist at the time Kennedy’s head explodes. Notice his right arm is low on the steering wheel. (Photo source – #312. Note that I enlarged, sharpened, and brightened this still.)

Spark Of Life Media began it’s search for the REAL truth at the start through 9/11. While researching 9/11 and getting involved with the personalities surrounding that research ’scene’ if you will, it almost seemed as though the ‘movement’ was controlling exactly which topics were key and which ones were played out or ’sandboxed’

What soon turns out to be the case is that with alot of the information put forth, it all has some kind of underlying message. When studying these personalities, the theories and their backgrounds. One may get emotionally connected to, not only the personality but the information itself. Even the lifestyle that comes with this illuminating information has a value. Once two theories interfere the reader/researcher has a problem, the subject is going to have to begin to exercises their own discernment.

Truth is just like government, it has it’s entire own set of politics. And just like any government, all of the politics are 100% fake on every level. Even a suspect personality like Richard C. Hoagland is credited with saying ‘The lie is different on every level.’ So it is clear that deception has become apart of the culture in the information age.

Infact, deception has become apart of norm in society, and since our parents were born into it and have suffered from it and their parents as well, we don’t know any better. So in most cases we don’t really see things as they are, we see things as we are.

So it basically comes down to having to sift through the information have the capacity of mind to determine what are the lies, what are the half-truths,the misinformation and beneath it all what is the underlying REAL truth. The only way to do this is to apply ones own personal belief structure of logic and reason.

For example, a very keen ‘truther’ in the ‘9/11 movement’ crowed is a man by the name of John Lear is a former CIA pilot who flew for Continental Airlines and Air America during the Vietnam War. He now claims to have no further connection to the CIA and is one of the most well known activists and researchers in the field of 9/11 being a government hoax.

Lear, in present day can be found all about the Internet claiming that ATS (above top secret)

It turns out that sources have claimed that ‘ATS is run by freemasons’ and is an intelligence gathering hub within the To back track, it is easy to assert that most of the counter-culture foundations in the 1960s were brought to be where they are today by the powers that be, the counter-culture cult in America is one of the greatest tricks ever played on humanity.

Suddenly it starts to unwind, we are living in a virtual reality. Lenin, the first communist dictator of Russia was credited with saying ‘The best way to control the opposition is control it ourselves,’

What Lenin was referring to was an old Vatican school of thought where deception is the name of ‘the game’ where as one will pretend to be a ‘protestant among protestant, or jew among jews’ to covertly upheave society and in the Vatican’s case, bring the teachings back to the Roman Catholic Church.

Another key tactic in deception is what is called voluntary compliance, this is the practice of telling people the flat out truth and smearing it up with one’s own bias personality traits and flaws. The overall key is to give the public the truth, twist it up with a ‘wacko’ bias opinion and hand over good valid information.

This is only to allow society to voluntarly enslave themselves. Basically what the overall goal is: to ultimately put the information right out in the open so that in the end, the powers that be can tell you ‘you didn’t do anything about it.’

A perfect example of this would be the ‘late’ William Cooper. Cooperclaimed to be ‘ex-naval intelligence’ and became most well known for his testimony of witnessing a large sub-merged unidentified object leave the ocean and fly into space.

Cooper was one of the first people to actually go to ‘area 51′ and take pictures of the famous ‘groom lake’ area.

Bill Cooper released a book that was entitled ‘behold a pale horse’ within the book Cooper gives a great deal of vastly detailed commentaries about societies function and our deep underlying conditioning. He also covers the JFK assassination and many other taboo topics. What is most interesting is his information about ETs. Though suspiciously vague about most of his information and never overly specific, Cooper seemed to be giving information that checks out with what research has shown.

These two prime examples, Bill Cooper and John Lear are a perfect exhibition of the fact that even though these guys are 100% controlled figures they still give out good, genuine information, the real challenge is to decide what is the truth and what is hogwash.

John Lear is one of two people in the world that has certification to fly ANY registered air craft in the world, this means that he has to have extensive involvement with the CIA, the Air Force and the very people he seems to be exposing. The fact that with his deep ties to the intel communities of the world show that cleary Lear is still a loyal to his superiors, doing bidding for the perpetrators.

Bill Cooper was outed publically by Bill Clinton and was named to be ‘one of the most dangerous people in the world’ In the main stream media he was connected to Timothy McVeigh the alleged bomber involved in the OKC incident in 1995. Cooper would actually claim that he was approached by McVeigh and that him and ‘his followers’ came to his house and told him they supported his work. Without even getting into the McVeigh involvement, any real devout truth seeker will tell you that no real truth can be substantiated by anything heard on a Presidential Radio Broadcast. If the media outed this guy as a threat it is a clear sign in this modern information era, that he was a controlled fake. [2]

A key point to make about Cooper is that during the middle of Cooper’s fame, he claimed that his own personal opinion was that the ‘government’ purposely showed him documents that he thought ‘at the time were sensative, but turned out the government was intentionally misleading him to distract the american public knowing that he would publish these documents and make them apart of the public spectrum. This one may say is a classic example of psychological operations and voluntary compliance.

One may recall a counter intelligence agent in the 70s known as ‘Deep Throat’ who gave valid information from the inside on the Nixon, Watergate scandal. Deep Throat’s role was to inform the public what they had right and what they had wrong, this seems to be the role of some personalities within the ‘truth movement’

Now with all this in mind it is hard to face the bottom line. Is this reversed alien technology that Cooper and Lear talk about a reality? or a deceptive myth ? To find out the deepest analysis of the most well known researcher in this field will be carried out.

David Wilcock
Project Camelot interviews David Wilcock – Part 1
Project Camelot interviews David Wilcock – Part 2
Project Camelot interviews David Wilcock – Part 3 of 4
Project Camelot interviews David Wilcock – Part 4 of 4
JUMPROOM TO MARS : a new conversation with David Wilcock
2012 Enigma

Wilcock claims to be a psycic healer and a channeler, he is best known for a series called ‘the law of one’ which he lays down the basic fundementals to a vast complex philosophical theory on how he feels the world and universe really works.

The main goal of this in-depth analysis is to determind if David Wilcock’s testimony is genuine, if so if he is being manipulated in any way and whether or not he has an agenda or over value for his audience to pick up on.

David Wilcock has a vast collection of information on his website divinecosmos.com

The Illuminati

On his website he shares a large amount of information which to the most part seems to be valid and fair to consider. Aswell as uncovering the physical mysteries of our reality, Wilcock (like David Icke) shares a tremendous amount of information concerning the <a href=”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reptilian_humanoid”>origin of evil</a> on this planet, in other words the research involving the ‘illuminati’

Wilcock claims that not only was William Shakespear a fictional character, but that the group of people that were really writting the material under this name used an illiterate homeless person as the figure in which this eminent piece of our culture would represent.

Francis Bacon, a free masonic author in the 1700s was apart of a plan to create a ‘new atlantis’

Bacon’s faction would go into the Vatican archives to retrieve a map from the past, with this map he would influence Christopher Columbus to find the new world and with that the dawn of the Illuminati.

Bacon’s group first created Shakespeare and with that the very basics in which all stories to this very day, will every be told. He was also the author of the King James version of the bible. He was truely one of the iconic figures credited with the conception of the Illuminati. Wilcock goes over very basic levels of occultism, he talks about how the subconscious mind communicates in symbols eludes to the secret societies use of these archetypes.

Wilcock seems to explain their origin pretty accurately right up to this day. He claims that one of the most dominant factions within the Illuminati is the Rothschild faction.

He says that the Rothschild faction is directly in control of the drugs and weapons trade. This is how they make their vast amounts of money to fund their black projects, he also claims that the Rothschilds have a hand in big pharma. A rather odd suggestion is that he says the Rothschild also control Hollywood and the music industry even though he himself is a soon to be well known film producer and currently a recording artist.

Most of his historical theories about the Illuminati and Secret Societies seem to be verified by present day research. Though, as it will be later shown. Wilcock has very biased opinions about the Illuminati today.

Alien Technology

The most profound aspect of Wilcock’s work comes in the field of surpressed technology. Wilcock has a number of connections to witnesses within the black ops community who claim to have been involved in secret operations that harness technology of a much advanced higher scientific and spiritual level.

The basis of what wilcock has collected and his theories begin during World War two, he claims that the <a href=”http://www.beyondweird.com/ufos/Bruce_Walton_The_Underground_Nazi_Invasion_30.html”>Nazi’s came in contact with a much advanced race of beings who called themselves the ‘Annunaki'</a>  He suggests that some anti-gravity technologies and occult teachings were gathered from this collection but for the most part it was mostly a contact of ideals, so to speak.

He later goes on to describe the 1940s crashes in Roswell, he claims that during these crashes a number of very profound pieces of technology would be given to the Rothschild faction of the Illuminati.

These devices included a ‘looking glass’ into the future that was named Yellowbook or Magicbox. What they also adventually ended up obtaining through reverse engineering was a chair from a space craft which had the ability to open worm holes that lead to ‘dream like worlds’

He claims that what this all relates to is the Pineal gland in the brain which is a natural source of DMT within the brain. Apparently from what DW has gathered, the Pineal gland has been worshipped by our society and throughout the world for hundreds of thousands of years, in fact a very large statue of a Pine cone sits outside of the Vatican.

How these black ops people got ahold of the device used in what Wilcock claims is known as the ‘Rainbow Project’ or ‘Montauk Project’ was by reverse engineering the seat of a UFO and by researching how this device worked they discovered (through use of the Looking Glass technology) that this technology did at one time exist on earth and that it could be retrieved.

This leads to a theory that is brought up by DW involving the ‘Nexus points’ or ‘nodes’ around the world. These are geometrical patterns around the earth that coincide with land marks.

These land marks, Wilcock claims, are <a href=”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonehenge”ancient parts of our history and were used hundreds of thousands of years ago by advanced spiritual beings who (in David’s opinion) were using these sacred areas to time travel and to do what is known conventionally as ‘teleporting’

One of the most well known area’s is a place called the ‘Bermuda Triangle’ which is known for mysterious disappearances related to that area. Some people have reported vanishing off the face of the earth while their planes remain intact, electromagnetic anomalies have been noticed for countless years in this area. A trivial fact concerning this is that if you took a pencil and poked a globe through the part that represents the Bermuda Triangle, you would come out at the deepest part of the Pacific Ocean, the islands off Japan. Both of these areas seem to have very well documented paranormal occurrences happen around them. At some point DW claims that a ‘faction’ of the Illuminati gained access to this sacred technology and began using it.

Witnesses sourced by Wilcock state that certain groups of the Illuminati in the 1950s were approached by Alien entities, the ones who gave them the technology and told them that the earth was in a state of peril, that their decision to use atomic weapons would turn out to be the eventually fallout of the human race, that by the year 2000 all of humanity would be whipped off the surface of the earth and only very few would survive and their bodies would mutated heavily. DW claims that the Illuminati understood that massive earth changes and world events would leave the world in ruins by the turn of the century and so they did the one thing they knew how to do, prepare.

Wilcock claims that every Apollo mission had UFO sightings with it and that an ET pressence assisted humans with their mission and helped them properly escape the Van Allen Belt around the earth without causing any serious bodily harm.

Wilcock just like his close friend Richard C. Hoagland asserts that the Moon Landing did happen and that the images are infact real.

Wilcock seems to drop dirt on himself when he mentions his connections to Richard C. Hoagland (confirmed fraud, connections to CBS, CFR & Knights Of Malta)

His close friend Richard C. Hoagland is credited with being one of the first people to bring up the idea of a ‘fake alien invasion’ being carried out by the powers that be.

Wilcock questions the theory that a ‘fake alien invasion’ will be the end result of this 2012 enigma. He questions it because of the level of technology being used, he claims that far more advanced technology exists that could ‘wipe out any fake ufos’

The fake alien invasion theory became most popular over the past 10 years, some people say that the theory has been around for years and that even the most notorious of controlled ops have speculated a fake alien invasion. It became more relevant recently when many people started bringing up the theory of holograms being used on 9/11.

This is a area that John Lear has a marvelous track record smearing up, as Hoagland would say ‘the lie is different on each level’ which seems to be the motto when looking at what really hit the WTC on 9/11. It is clear that TV-FAKERY was an elaborate cover for what really was used, many people at first questioned the ‘sloppyness’ per say of the fake 9/11 plane crash videos.

However it has become increasingly clear that a much bigger cover-up is going on involving planted operatives within the movement. Such a well though out and interchangeable plan is the calling card of professionals, people like Zbiginew Brizinski.

Brizinksi is a well known member of the powers that be, he is known to be closely aligned to the ‘Rothschild faction’ and clearly had a complicit role in the planning of operations on 9/11. Wilcock claims that Brizinski’s ultimate goal is to take out Russia. This theory seems to ‘jive’ well with others because it has been observed by many that much of the alternative media today is anti-war Iraq and Afghanistan, but pro-war Russia and China.

Again, Wilcock is not a believer in the theory of a ‘staged alien invasion.’ In fact, in some of his interviews he claims that the ‘russians’ have much superior technology and that any kind of sophisticated craft would be no match to ‘the russian’s’ scalar weapons.

Hoagland while being best known for his work with Mars and the Moon, from time to time will jump into a different field of research when collaborating with Wilcock. One particular topic is Scalar Technology and the question of weather wars. Hoagland is best known for his research involving the mysterious number two in the weather radar during Hurricane Wilma in 2006 over Flordia.

Wilcock also claims that a clear example of a demonstration involving scalar weapons was the ‘jellification’ of the Interstate bridge in St. Paul Mini in 2007.

Wilcock continually pushes the mind pattern of victimization and fear, he constantly mentions the U.S invading Iran. He over exaggerates facts and claims that ‘fossil fuels are dwindling.’ this is the kind of half-truth argument you would hear in the late 90s, even then the theory had trouble holding water and today nothing has changed. Not to mention the fact that if Scalar weapons do exist it is clear that free-energy is a reality. A simple contradiction.

Wilcock also seems to maybe blocking the truth regarding Scalar technology. It is widely known that the ‘chemtrail’ myth is a cover-up for some kind of higher technology. Scalar weapons seem to have merged with some kind of tesla projection technology that can create illusions or holograms in the sky. Wilcock fails to mention any kind of relation to this.


Wilcock is apart of the school of though which builds from Scott Mandelker’ ‘From Else There’ which revealed that a group of higher-evolved entities, left eternity, fell back into time to help others on this planet evolve.

DW claims that these people do not know who they are yet and that as time gets close and closer to what he calls ‘Asertion’ people will begin to realize who they are what kind of spiritual gifts they have. DW calls these people ‘Wanderers’ the name has also been given by one Alex Collier, ‘the platul’

Some of Wilcock’s behaviour sets off red flags in the mind of a skeptical truth seeker. A well known tactic of the counter intelligence community is to use emotional crutches to basically bribe people into buying a phony story. In this case, while David cries over the fact that he might be part alien. This camera zooms up and clearly shows that ‘these tears are real’ knowing that Wilcock has connections to the Film industry it wouldn’t be surprising if David took some acting lessons.

Wilcock claims that he is the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce, Cayce claimed that he was the reincarnation of an ancient atlantian man who helped ‘build the pryamids’

Wilcock claims that the universe is going through a elaberote change of events, one change is the climate of our universe and how it is heating up. Wilcock is a firm believer of interplanetary climate change (enterprise mission.com) Wilcock’s philosophy is very interesting, he seems to covertly adopt the teachings of the Christian Church through a new-age metaphorical twist. This is the calling card of many new-age counter-culture icons.

Wilcock claims that in one of his profound readings he received a message that said ‘Christ Cometh’ refering to the return of Jesus Christ. This is strange because Wilcock says he is not Christian at all, though he believes that the bible ‘teaches good things.’ Wilcock may not be a devout christian, but he does seem to mention Jesus Christ quite alot in his ‘2012’ lectures. This lends credence to the fundamentalist ideal that the ‘prince of peace’ is going to return in the near future.

More evidence of his christian message is when Wilcock gives a very interesting and disturbing prospective on how he sees the Christian/Islam conflict that is currently going on.

He compares World War 2 and Hitler’s prosecution of ‘the jews’ to George Bush and his crusade against Islam. What DW is doing here is perpetuating one dimensional thinking, he fails to mention the persecution jewish people face today. All over the world ‘patriots’ and people who claim to ‘seek the truth’ are blaming ‘zionists jews’ for the problems in our world. This is an exact parallel to what the Germans did to the jews, blaming them for bankrupting their country after the first World War.

Wilcock even gives more credence to the idea that he may be provoking racism, in one of his interviews he claims that ‘black people are genuine to this earth’ and that all other races of humans can be found on other planets. He claims that this why ‘the powers that be’ are so racist to blacks. This sets off dozens of red flags. Typical double think.

Now among David’s vast library of claims and information you will find what seems to legitamint research. At the same time, while sifting through the material it is realised that DW will sometimes make silly assertions that are either juvenile or circumstantial evidence that he is a fraud.

Wilcock believes that terminator GMO crops can not physically destroy plants 100%. He insist that plants can re-generate their basic DNA even after it has been fuised with something else. This seems to be him justifying monsanto’s agenda. This is pantheonism at it’s finest.

Another odd aspect of David’s philosophy is his lack of total comportment. In his book he says that one can survive the ‘ascension’ (2012) by being only just 51% intended on helping others. He claims that if you are 49% caught up in your self that is okay, but that only 51% of intention is needed to bring about a successful ‘ascension’

Wilcock also defends the theory that Humans came from Venus when it has been well documented in Zecharia Sitchin work that Venus was more than likely an artificial object pushed into our orbit and his work also detailed photographs taken by a NASA probe that showed 7 separate collapsed dome like structures that are shown on the surface of Venus.

This seems to coincide with theories that 7 different Reptilian species interact with humans, though Wilcock claims that Reptilians may not exist.

All of this seems suspect. Further more Wilcock denies the fact that human beings are being taken and used as food, he questions the validity of the (thousands) of stories and says that ‘to the best of his knowledge most of the abductions are pleasant’ again more red flags.

He also insists that the universe only consists of Humanoid entities, this is almost silly to even consider. Along with that, Wilcock denies that the earth is hollow.

Wilcock has odd theories about the power structure of the illuminati, for instance he asserts the idea that the ‘neo-cons’ of the united states have a key role in the NWO. This is something yet to be confirmed or denied, though in a more recent interview DW alleges that George Bush Sr. and Dick Chainey are ahead of the ‘Rockerfeller faction of the Illumintari’ this is highly suspect because it would mean that the high ranks of the illuminati are in some kind of deep disagreement and after all of these years it seems silly to think that they would this plan fall apart.

Wilcock also makes ridiculous assertions when stating ‘Sarah Palin was not supposed to be picked for VP’ and that ‘the Illuminati is losing ground.’ Infact, wilcock claims that August 16th was a turning point in the 2012 enigma. He says that Palin was not supposed to be picked and that it is a sign of the powers that be ‘infighting’ This has turned out to be a total smear on the truth, it turned out that weeks before the election a number of researchers revealed that McCainPalin.com was registered 7 months (to the day) before it was announced she would be running for Vice President. This alone proves Wilcock’s theory wrong. He also claims that August 16th ‘may have been the day the illuminati lost the war.’ He mentions this because on August 16th Russia supposedly (according to him) took out CIA forces in Georgia and while fleeing the CIA left special documents that ‘prevents the powers that be from carrying out their agenda,’ It is hard to say if there is any validity to this claim at all, especially after realizing that Wilcock firmly believes that Putin and Russia are out to ‘prevent a New World Order.’

In some of his more recent audio blogs Wilcock takes a moment to call out any of his listeners who ‘do not respect Barak Obama’ Wilcock defends Obama and says that he is ‘one of the good guys’ even though his wife and appointed VP have deep ties to the CFR and Knights Of Malta. Not only that, but Obama’s most senior foreign adviser is a man by the name Zbigniew Brzinski, a man credited with the foundations for the ‘Plan For A New American Century’ in his book ‘The Grand Chessboard’ 1997. Wilcock justifies this appointment with the phrase ‘you keep your friends close, and you your enemies closer.’ He insists that Obama and Putin will ‘work together’ to ‘bring down the NWO,’ He says that the top factions of the illuminati are in a confrontation. He claims that- he claims that ‘Rockerfeller owns the Reds and the ‘neo cons’ and the Rothschilds own the democrats and they have batteled over the control of the NSA and CIA for years, this seems to be typical disinformation, the theory of infighting seems like a huge distraction.

A key aspect of Wilcock’s claims is that even though he brings up the fact that the upper military have access to technology that can see into the future, he smears the truth by telling people that ‘they no longer have access to this kind of technology.’

What this seems to be is a perfect example of a trait from the ‘Art Of War’ the act of making yourself look less significant then you are.

This seems to be Wilcock’s agenda, to make the Illuminati look like they are losing. He says that the Rockerfeller side of the Illuminati will fall then quickly the Rothschild family will fall. This is the same theory brought about by Ben Fulford a Jesuit Canadian who has deep connections to Japanese mob and the Rockerfeller family, Wilcock is a close friend of Benjamin Fulford.

Wilcock will even go further and say that some members of these factions are ‘leaving the order and waking up.’

Some signs that Wilcock may have been ‘gotten to’ is that he openly supports the military and voting. In the opinion of the analyst he is either either brainwashed, mind controlled, a fake, a clone, or just plain stupid.

When it is all said and done there are a number of key aspects that prove that David Wilcock is some kind of an intelligence agent and that his role is to perpetuate a certain frame of mind to the public and may or may not be entirely based on truth, though it seems some of it is. A number of different ‘projects’ have been mentioned by Wilcock in his work. It seems as though things like “montauk” and “looking glass” may not be the entire truth. A number of different names have been brought up by people like William Cooper and Stewart Swerdlow. Some people claim ‘Looking Glass’ was actually called ‘Yellowbook’ and ‘Montauk’ was actually called ‘Rainbow’ this could mean that Wilcock’s disclosure of these technology is not entirely based on fact and it could be hiding a deeper truth. Though it seems that the main goal of Wilcock is to intentionally confuse researchers and to condition them into believing that the Illuminati is divided and that some kind of struggle is going on within the new world order, this is classic ‘art of war’ and the basic foundation of deception.

November 25, 2008

9/11 MAVs ?


http://angelsfortruth.com/Military%20Orbs.html

The Micro Air Vehicle (MAV) Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) developed a
backpackable, fully autonomous, vertically launched-and-landed ducted fan UAV capable of
providing electro-optical or infrared hover-and-stare support to the dismounted Soldier.
The MAV air vehicle is small (less than 14-inch duct outer diameter), flies autonomously,
has an endurance of 55 minutes at sea level, and can operate at altitudes over 10,000 feet.
These capabilities make it ideal for operations in the complex/urban terrain and extreme
conditions typical of restricted military environments.
http://www.darpa.mil/Docs/DARPA2007Strateg…inalMarch14.pdf

Knowing how the U S Government violates privacy laws using the excuse of “security”,
what caught my attention is that Honeywell markets their MAV for urban civilian use as well.
http://www.honeywell.com/sites/aero/Surfac…8CBB5BDECF7.htm

So when will Nano Air Vehicles be spying on us?

DARPA NANO AIR VEHICLE PROGRAM
The objectives of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Nano Air
Vehicle (NAV) program are to develop and demonstrate an extremely small (less than 7.5 cm
wingspan), ultra-lightweight (weighing less than 10 grams) air vehicle system with the potential
to perform indoor and outdoor military missions in challenging environments.
The initial 18-month phase of the program ended in spring of 2008. During the first
phase, four contractors, AeroVironment Inc., Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Lockheed Martin
Advanced Technology Laboratories, and MicroPropulsion Corp., developed technologies for lift
generation and vehicle control via rotating and flapping wings, advanced stability and control
using video images, and analytical tools for developing low Reynolds number aircraft. The
contractors also conducted trade studies, risk mitigation testing and demonstrations, and
completed preliminary designs of their vehicle concepts.

Based on the results of the initial phase, DARPA selected AeroVironment to continue
developing its Nano Air Vehicle design. The continuing design effort by AeroVironment, which
will be completed in less than six months, will focus on further development of critical aspects of
their flapping wing concept. If this additional development work is successful, DARPA will
start an 18-month detailed design effort that will conclude with prototype system fabrication and
flight demonstrations.

“The NAV program will push the limits of aerodynamic and power conversion
efficiency, endurance and maneuverability for very small air vehicle systems,” explained Dr.
Todd Hylton, DARPA program manager. “We are interested in a system that has 20 minutes of
flight time, can withstand 2.5 meters per second wind gusts, can operate inside buildings and
have up to a kilometer command and control range.” In addition, the vehicle would be able to
hover and deliver a two-gram payload inside a building.

(Biological warfare? Two grams of weaponized anthrax have been shown to contain as many
as two trillion spores which, theoretically, could cause about 200 million deaths. Dr. Todd Hylton
is the DARPA Nano Air Vehicle project manager. He is also project manager for the Self
Decontaminating Surfaces Program and the Biological Sensory Structure Emulation Program.)

DARPA NANO AIR VEHICLE PROGRAM- May 2008
http://www.arpa.mil/Docs/NAV_fact_sheet_Ma…07180945041.pdf

Todd Hylton, Ph.D.
http://www.darpa.mil/dso/personnel/hylton.htm

AmandaReconWith
http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=5690&view=findpost&p=15295010

9/11 – SIMCITY 2001 Virtual Reality.

TV’s 9/11 simulated lanscapes of Manhattan were necessary to control all aspects of the real-life events unfolding – and not only the ‘planecrash’ scenes. The ‘explosive-rigged towers’ might have popped here and there and that would not have been good for TV viewers to see. The moving backgrounds/foregrounds, etc… are only a part of the many tell-tale signs of the manipulations going on. One may wish to focus only on the most blatant proof of video doctoring and just go with an Occam’s razor exposé. After all, the planecrash shots are by now ALL proven fakes. The layering issue may not be as blatant or as easily grasped as the various color schemes, maskings and swiveling choppers with static backdrops – but it certainly merits due attention. Let me provide a few samples – judge for yourself…

Frames from SEPTEMBER CLUES H

The two shots below are from FOX and NBC. Before even thinking ‘perspectives’, one has to keep in mind these are two rival TV Networks. What odds for them to have such similar vantage points ?

The next two shots are from FOX and ABC. Again, before even thinking ‘perspectives’, one has to keep in mind these are two rival TV Networks. What odds for them to have such similar vantage points ?

The next two frames are from ABC during the 1st tower collapse – only seconds apart (the entire backdrop is seen moving pretty swiftly on video, laterally AND vertically).

The next two shots are courtesy of the BBC, broadcast just as you see them in the frame below : two videos side by side: one yellow and the other black/white… Note the Verrazzano bridge in the background, considerably different in size and position – at the same moment in time – and hardly from very diverse camera angles…

The CNN broadcasts – which featured no helicopter shots (mostly only Aaron Brown reporting from a ‘rooftop’) – didn’t show us the Jersey shore backdrop at all ! This was probably a ‘wise’ idea as it could have provided a static basis of comparison which might have exposed the FOX/NBC/ABC ‘chopper’ shots and their various perspective problems.

Below, Simon compares a (low-res) TOURIST PICTURE with a CNN shot
It is unlikely that any difference in vantage point (height) would account for the Jersey shore to disappear completely on CNN. Judge by yourself.

Let us keep focused on what, IMHO, the main questions of this debate should be :
(1) : “Are the 9/11 live broadcasts otherwise normal footage with animation planes added on top”
or

(2) : “Are the 9/11 live broadcasts for the most part composed with digital renderings of the landscape”

Simon’s reasoning for ruling out hypothesis (1) is :

– no satisfactory explanation for the various ‘pastel’ color schemes. Top range broadcast cameras have ISO standard automatic white balance settings for daylight conditions.

– no satisfactory explanation for the plastic, cartoon-like texture of the landscapes conspicuously evident even in the highest archive resolution footage available.

– no satisfactory explanation for the ‘mask linings’ seen around buildings in a wide range of shots. No explanation for observed black/transparent ghost contours.

– at least 4 newschoppers were allegedly in the air, yet all seem to be hovering roughly in the same area (views almost always from Northern vantage points). The few shots we have (ABC) of a chopper sweepingly circling and filming from South never catches any of the other choppers supposedly hovering in the airspace North of the towers.

– virtually all choppers seen in the 9/11 broadcasts simply zap by at sustained speed from one side of the screen to the other. No newschoppers, to be sure…

– some of the alleged NBC chopper shots have the towers swaying alarmingly, causing TV anchors to wonder aloud if the towers are leaning… That pendulum movement is precisely what gyroscopic cameras are designed to impede.

-some of the alleged ABC chopper shots show the chopper landing gear rotating in front of camera lens while the NY scenery remains perfectly static.

– perspective problems with foregrounds/backgrounds (and disappearing backdrops) not reasonably explainable by cinematic dollyzoom special effects. Newschoppers are supposed to and will film aerial sceneries in normal fashion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolly_zoom

There’s much more one could add to this list of observations, but let’s try an Occam’s razor-style argumentation to rationalize the entire issue :

WHAT ODDS FOR 4 MAJOR (rival) TV NETWORKS TO FEATURE AERIAL/ROOFTOP VIEWS, ALL STRIKINGLY SIMILAR BUT FOR THEIR (bizarre) COLOR SCHEMES ?

NBC aerial view of Manhattan

ABC aerial view of Manhattan

FOX

CNN rooftop view of Manhattan

In the light of these observations, hypothesis (2) appears to be the most reasonable and logical conclusion :

The 9/11 live broadcasts were composed with digital renderings of the landscape – in all likelyhood by a central command / TV op-centre such as : http://www.scl.cc

Color schemes were tweaked to convey the illusion of ‘diversity’ between (what was meant to represent) the images of 5 major TV networks.

-The NBC TV archive shot is 14 seconds before the 2nd strike.
-The “In Memoriam” shot’s timeline is unknown – but we’ll soon see why it doesn’t matter.

We have 4 boats. Let’s give them names :
A = Ace
B= Bob
C= Cargo
J = Jolly

Now as you can see, the “In Memoriam” shot shows Bob quite a bit further ahead while Cargo and Jolly disappear from view. So far, so good. We may assume the 14 seconds to the 2nd strike are now down to X (?) seconds.

The problem is…we also have the infamous, non-archive, home-recorded NBC shot (which hardly shows anything at all – only a fuzzy streak diving into the tower). But as the exit hole explodes, this is what we observe : Ace – Bob – Cargo & Jolly are all there ! Note their respective positions.

Of particular and crucial interest is that Cargo is in a position where it certainly should be visible in the “Memoriam” shot. But it is not. It’s long gone.

So how did that happen ? Anyone familiar with video (or audio) multitrack editing will know how easily tracks may slip out of synch (with each other) if you’re moving markers on a set timeline. The “In Memoriam” docu was likely a re-edit of old material used on 9/11. They ran the background images ‘faster’ than the foreground images (buildings) – which have also been rotated more than the originals : As a matter of fact, that particular angle of view (slightly more to the left of the towers) was NEVER SEEN on 9/11 and is nowhere to be seen in the NBC archives. All this may seem complex to the layman but unfortunately that is what all this research is about. Blood sweat and tears .

FOXED OUT part2 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9LURV-joLI
( the “JIM and BOB” comparison towards the end of the video)

If you want to read up on how fake imagery is morphed together, you can do that in the Air Force’s seminal Information Warfare paper by Stein.

http://ics.leeds.ac.uk/papers/vp01.cfm?outfit=pmt&folder=66&paper=493

The backdrop was removed from some of the 9-11 videos shown on TV. That’s a proven fact. Why was it removed? To hide evidence…

Many of the “boats” and “helicopters” and “birds” and “people” and “helicopter skis” are just art assets that the perps overlaid onto other images. They’re not any different from the monsters running back and forth on screen in a video game.

Many of the 9-11 videos are montages of various elements. It’s the most common type of fakery around. Read “The Commissar Vanishes”. These days, the montage process has even been automated and commercialized.

http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1400181.1400202&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE


http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html#MSNBC_Live

Notice the weird “wobbling” in this short video clip gif as it pans to the left as the “plane” is seen flying down before disappearing behind the WTC before the feed is switched to a different angle.

Full video show more “wobbling” and “zoom clues”:





– all 5 depict the same moment in time
– all 5 are full-frontal views of the twin towers
– all 5 are set in different sceneries – and vastly different colors
– all 5 are, consequently, shot from 5 different cameras
– all 5 are thus aligned on the same axis, whether they be shot

from helicopters, rooftops or, as some folks want to explain it,
“a much lower vantage point” (Matrix number 1…)

– 4 out of the 5 show a minuscule blob passing between the towers – which is not ‘falling debris’ as stated in the Anthony Lawson/Nick Irving debunking efforts of the first version of Sept Clues. I have shown that the blob is synched to the ‘airplane’ motion.

You may not rate Simon Shack as a serious researcher and He does not want to be wasting anyone’s ‘precious time’. However, as a man of common sense, Simon asks us to use our own judgement to explain to how these 5 shots may have occured in the Real World.

YURI FAKTOROVICH is a russian pilot who purportedly flew by the 9/11 crime scene (North to South) in his little Cessna aircraft.

Grabbing his camera (this is how the official story goes), this is what he shot through his window as he approached Manhattan :

As we crop YURI’s picture, we get this pretty familiar view : a coincidence, of course.
(Note the Verrazzano bridge, always perfectly aligned…)

But our friend YURI also shot 3 more pictures as he drove his little Cessna past the 9/11 crime scene..

Funnily enough, his last picture failed to capture any of the many TV choppers filming the crime scene…Oh wait, maybe your fine eye will FIND ONE !

THE 9/11 ABC broadcast (btw 8:53 and 9:12AM)

ABC’s broadcast starts off with this watercolor view of the towers. Now let’s assume for now these are all REAL images taken from ABC’s Chopper7. All right ?
ABC at 8:53

ABC at 8:54 ( This tripod shot from East is briefly aired a couple of times)

ABC at 8:58 : Chopper 7 catches one of several choppers seen in the 9/11 broadcasts which almost invariably zap by as if they had some more urgent matters to tend to…

ABC at 8:59 : Chopper7 is now proceeding in southwestern direction around the towers ( its gyroscopic camera evidently, shall we say, malfunctioning…)

ABC at 9:00 Chopper 7 is now full west of the WTC : it catches another chopper, perhaps the only slowly hovering chopper that we may find on all the 5 TV networks that morning. Hey, could it be NBC’s Chopper 4 ?..

ABC at 9:01 : Chopper 7 is now south of the towers (still on the western side).

ABC at 9:02 : Now – in less than a minute – Chopper7 is back northwest of the towers (which get locked into position to prepare for the cartoon strike).

At roughly the same time, another camera locks into position (see picture at right) only seconds before the ‘airplane’ strike.

ABC at 9:03 : Airliner animation zaps by and disappears behind towers.

ABC at 9:03+ : Chopper 7’s camera (awkwardly placed between the well-focused ‘legs’ of the chopper) slickly ‘pulls’ the towers into center of picture. No doubt, a camera with many special features…

ABC at 9:05 : Now, chopper 7’s camera pulls off another trick : its gyroscopic system actually compensates for the direction changes of its carrier! One could also applaud the depth of field of the camera which focuses with ease both close-up and distant fields.

ABC at 9:08 : Chopper7 is now back to a (north-westerly) airspace much nearer to the towers than a few minutes ago. Those chopper skids still getting in the way…although in a less annoying manner. The image is darker than ever.

ABC at 9:08 + : Now this is when things start to get interesting : the live TV feed abruptly switches from the dark shot to another bright-green, washed-out image which seems to be from another chopper altogether. Did ABC have not one, but TWO choppers in the air ? This is not a replay – nothing in the broadcast suggests this is meant to be anything else than continuous and unedited live footage.

ABC at 9:09 : After a while, the bright-green shot (from a chopper clearly in another position) switches back again to the darker images of chopper7 … or which is which ? What’s going on ?

ABC at 9:12 : Finally, we are graced with this infamous shot.
Compare it to the colors and brightness of the 1st picture at 8:53…

Please note : Chopper 7 at NO time leaves the western/north-western area of the scenery. How YURI FAKTOROVICH (see previous post in this thread) failed to catch NBC’s Chopper4, ABC’s Chopper7 (or the phantom 2nd ABC chopper) as he flew by in his Cessna is quite a mystery…

Conclusions : the burden of proof lies with those who claim these are authentic images filmed by TV choppers. We now understand more about the 9/11 plan : it was principally based around a media-backed mass illusion. Along a logical line of reasoning, we can reach to a conclusion dictated by plain, deductive common sense : little or no parts of the real-life events were supposed to be aired on television. It was way too great a risk – and a rather silly one to take given the means and technology available. We are looking at computer-generated imagery. By definition, such images are not real – they are false.

TWO FAST FLY-BY CHOPPERS IN THE HAZE

The Russian Cessna pilot ‘YURI FAKTOROVICH’, by contrast, offered us some of the best resolution pictures of the crime scene available. If choppers were hovering around the place , they would certainly be visible. But there’s none.
Now let’s have another look at Yuri’s first and last (of 4) pictures :

YURI’S SHOT ARRIVING AT THE SCENE ( about 9:01 ?)

YURI’S SHOT DEPARTING THE SCENE ( about 9:04 ? )

In my ABC chronology 8:53 – 9:12 (see my previous post) I have showed that ABC’s ‘Chopper7’ hovers southwest of the towers at 9:01 . Chopper7 never leaves the west-northwest-southwest airspace around the towers. If it is 5 miles away – as you say – ‘Chopper7’ should certainly not be hidden by the smoke…

Now, as you must know (if you’ve done your homework as a serious researcher), NBC’s ‘Chopper4’ filmed ‘Flight175’s crash with an almost head-on view of the towers, after which it started drifting westwards too. Here it is at around 9:06. Does it look like a shot taken from 5 miles away ? Note that ‘remarkable’, superfast zoom-in just as that chopper-skid again swishes in front of the camera … ( The shot on the right is the direct continuation of the sequence, just to show that what obscures the camera is indeed the chopper skid…)

NBC at around 9:06

The ‘beauty’ of this research is that we can use our own eyes to make progress towards determining whether what we were shown on Tv on 9/11 was real or not.

Let us check out what happened around the collapse of WTC2.
We will compare a clip from the Camera Planet archives with a clip from NBC.

-Clip at left is from CameraPlanet at the time of the WTC2 collapse :

-Clip at right is a replay from NBC (Matt Lauer’s voiceover goes : “Don’t know if this is the correct tape…”)

Of course, these GIF files Simon is posting here are small : I hope you will take his word for the fact that the chopper seen on CameraPlanet (which takes a Northwestern direction at start of collapse) is not seen at anytime on NBC (on my fullscreen, high-res version).

Now, let’s see who have released these 2 clips :

This is the ‘mission statement’ of the CameraPlanet archive :
http://video.google.com/911anniversary.html

“What began as a search for footage for a single film has turned into a world-wide resource for filmmakers, historians, and scientists. The CameraPlanet Archive is the world’s largest single collection of video recorded on and around attacks on the World Trade Center.”

NBC is one of the major US TV networks and as such, I believe, needs no introduction…

So, I ask you : who are you going to call to ask for a clarification : NBC or CameraPlanet ? Both ? Should we wait for Shure aka Jeff Hill to do this for us or are we going to do something about it ?

We are not looking for a BLACK chopper that flies BEHIND the smoke BEFORE the collapse (and disappears thereafter) such as the one you posted :

We are looking for a WHITE chopper that flies IN FRONT of the towers (and well clear of the smoke) AFTER the collapse.

Besides, if we are to apply the wondrous “911 TV footage chromatic standards” to your black chopper, it should turn white if it flew in front of the smoke !…

Chopper2 apparently shot the WTC2 collapse from south. FOX5 apparently aired that shot too :

Here’s what is said in the CBS studio : Over 30seconds after the collapse, JIM SMITH (who apparently is inside Chopper2) reports : “…..it appears that the top portion of the building has collapsed down to the streets below…”

http://www.septclues.com/CBS%20chopper2%20…JIM%20SMITH.aif

Now , yet again, it’s anyone’s guess where Chopper2 might be in these pictures…

Jim Smith is one of at least four TV people who report “…the top portion of the building has collapsed” – sometimes long after it is evident the whole tower has been blown to fine dust.

Something flew out the other side, this is what they were trying to hide.

-SparkOfLife/SimonShack

November 6, 2008

Truth in 7 Minutes – Election Chat w/ Markus Allen

Nov 4th/2008 – Truth in 7 Minutes – Election Chat w/ Markus Allen

Truth In 7 Minutues.com

November 4, 2008

Obama 100% Fraud

Filed under: 9/11, Mind Control, PSYOPS, Spark Of Life Truth — Tags: — master @ 9:59 pm

obamafraud1

His most senior foreign advisor wrote the book ‘The Grand Chessboard’ which was a foundation plan for 9/11, he wrote it in 1997, he was also on the PNAC group (plan for a new american century) the guy’s name is Zigmond Brzezinski who funded the Taliban in the 70s under Jimmy Carter and was one of the masterminds behind the CIA counter-intelligence group known as Al-Quida.

Systematic Demolition of WTC (exo-nuke + DEW thesis)

October 31, 2008

Oct 30th – Truth in 7 Minutes W/ Markus Allan – Chad Andrews – ‘Lord Tsukasa’ – Alix MacMillan ‘Spark Of Life’

Truth in 7 Minutes W/ Markus Allan, Chad Andrews, \'LT\' & Alex (SparkOfLife)

October 25, 2008

Evidence of Layering and Chroma Key used on 9/11

October 23, 2008

No Bridge/Different Backgrounds

Older Posts »

Blog at WordPress.com.