Spark Of Life Media

December 4, 2008

Moon Landing Fakery


The NSA probably was on the moon since the 1950s. And the Apollo missions were a cover for what was really going on.

Now some skeptics will mention things like ‘Mythbusters’ and other television programs owned by Viacom and General Electric as ‘proof’ that the Apollo Moon Landing images were infact NOT fake.

Myth Buster is produced by BBC ? BBC did a story on 9/11, it was a total smear campaign. If you actually think your gonna find even the slightest bit of truth from Cable television, you are out of your element.

Mythbuster is 100% juvenille.
Their science, if there ever is any, is so full of holes. They obviously try to alter the outcomes of half of their tests. I can tell that they want to prove a myth correct if they use things like “controls”, but they get most of their fans by debunking myths, so when they drop things like the controls for some simpletons tests that do not account for half of the variables, then you know within 120 seconds of the stories start that they will prove the myth “busted” at the end.

For people who claim they love science, watching a show hosted by two special effects guys that ignores all base scientific technique in 90% of the cases, mythbusters fans seem to be eager to ignore science, for the reward that a TV show said that other people are loony.

The proof is in the pudding if you know ANYTHING about photography you will be amazed to see the amount of evidence provided that every image they showed us of the moon landing was a composite fake.

1. Shadows do not run parallel.

2. Identical Backgrounds, this is impossible.

3. The earth is 8 times the diameter of the moon. This image should be bigger. Also, it’s as if some kind of moon atmosphere exists, the earth would not look like this from the moon.


It seems on the moon that Shadows do crazy things like ignore white.
This is impossible.

I also didn’t know that Buzz Aldrin was 8ft’ tall, but that seems to have to be the case in this photo.

Notice how his head is 100% aligned with the horizon.

Same here, directly through the horizon. This is impossible.

The NASA images made the horizon black because they couldn’t show what was on the moon. Beyond the black are structures and probably vehicles that they couldn’t show, so they blacked them out.

If you actually think this is what the moon looks like, please go do a test and line your head up 100% with the horizon. Even on Earth it is impossible.

There are a number of operations going on, on the moon.
This is some kind of reactor, what people on the inside call ‘Alternative 3’

The depiction of NASA’s view of how moon bases would look in a 1958 issue of National Geographic is in fact exactly what they actually built on the moon in February1958. When Kennedy said “we are
going to send men to the moon,” part of the US Military – the NSA – was already there.

The moon is an artificial object in space. The moon is the only object in all of KNOWN space that does not rotate. It is like a vehicle parked in space which is EXACTLY what it is.

Some people claim that the technology in the 1950s was no sufficient enough to make it to the moon.

1. The cold war was a hoax, it was put together to make it look like the Russians and US were enemies when in fact they were the closest of allies.

The $5 Trillion Cold War Hoax
http://www.whale.to/b/mullins6.html

2. Now your saying that the military didn’t have that kind of technology in that era, that is just a SILLY thing to claim. The NAZI’s utilized Anti-Gravity aircrafts.

Nazi Germany claimed the territory of New Swabia in Antarctica, sent an expedition there in 1938, and planned others.

Nazi Germany conducted research into advanced propulsion technology, including rocketry, Viktor Schauberger’s turbine research, and the Arthur Sack A.S.6 experimental “flying disc”.

Some UFO sightings during World War II, particularly those known as foo fighters, were thought to be enemy aircraft.

Free-Energy existed since the late 1930s. They brought it to the moon in the 50s.
Technology advances so fast, the average human being is probably 100 years behind what actual secret technology can do.

There is raw photographic evidence and testimony of people who have been involved in the creation of NAZI anti-gravity space vehicles.




Mumbai TV-FAKERY ?

Mumbai 27/11 was an Inside Job.

Mumbai rocked by deadly attacks



Gunmen have carried out a series of co-ordinated attacks across the Indian city of Mumbai (Bombay), killing at least 80 people and injuring 200 more.

At least seven high-profile locations were hit in India’s financial capital, including two luxury hotels where hostages were reported to be held.

A fire is sweeping through the Taj Mahal Palace, Mumbai’s most famous hotel, which is now ringed by troops.

Police said four suspected terrorists have been killed and nine arrested.

Flames and black smoke billow from the Taj Mahal Palace hotel, Mumbai

The situation is still confused but the city’s main train station, a hospital, a restaurant and two hotels – locations used by foreigners as well as local businessmen and leaders – are among those places caught up in the violence.

There are reports of gunfire and explosions taking place elsewhere in the city, and reports of a hostage situation at a hospital.

Commandos have now surrounded the two hotels, the Taj Mahal Palace and the Oberoi Trident, where it is believed that the armed men are holding dozens of hostages.

One eyewitness said that the attackers had singled out British and American passport holders.

If this report is true, our security correspondent Frank Gardner says it implies an Islamist motive – attacks inspired or co-ordinated by al-Qaeda.

A claim of responsibility has been made by a previously unknown group calling itself the Deccan Mujahideen.

Our correspondent says it could be a hoax or assumed name for another group.

The motive is far from clear – but the attacks come amid elections in several Indian states, including in disputed Kashmir.

In the latest developments:

• Fire crews have been evacuating people from the upper floors of the Taj Mahal Palace, from where flames and smoke could be seen billowing

• The head of Mumbai’s anti-terrorism unit and two other senior officers are among those killed, officials say

• The White House holds a meeting of top intelligence and counter-terrorism officials, and pledges to help the Indian government.

Gunmen opened fire at about 2300 local time (1730 GMT) at the sites in southern Mumbai.

Mumbai journalist: “Gunmen were looking for Westerners”

“The terrorists have used automatic weapons and in some places grenades have been lobbed,” said AN Roy, police commissioner of Maharashtra state.

Local TV images showed blood-splattered streets, bodies being taken into ambulances and dramatic shots of what appeared to explosions and fire inside the Taj Mahal hotel.

One eyewitness told the BBC he had seen a gunman opening fire in the Taj Mahal’s lobby.

He said he had seen people fall before he fled the lobby.

“All I saw was one man on foot carrying a machine gun type of weapon – which I then saw him firing from and I saw people hitting the floor, people right next to me,” he said.

International reaction
There has been a wave of bombings in Indian cities in recent months which has left scores of people dead.

Most of the attacks have been blamed on Muslim militants, although police have also arrested suspected Hindu extremists.

Mumbai itself has also been attacked in the past: in July 2006 a series of bomb attacks on busy commuter trains killed almost 190 people and injured more than 700.

Police accused Pakistan’s intelligence agency of planning those attacks,
which they said were carried out by an Islamist militant group, Lashkar-e-Toiba.

Pakistan rejected the allegation, saying there was no evidence that its intelligence staff were involved.

But the latest shootings come at a time when ties between India and Pakistan have improved.

Just days ago Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari told a summit in Delhi that Pakistan would not be first to carry out a missile strike on India.

The two countries have a joint anti-terror mechanism whereby they are supposed to share information on terrorist attacks.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7751160.stm

As soon as you hear “Al Qaeda”, then you know that the attack is another operation. Consider the fact that westerners were targeted in this attack. When the story hits the news, what is more likely to effect the hearts of the public? Indian casualties or American/British casualties? This is a multinational, GlobIntel attack.. Just like 9-11, 7-7, Bhutto, etc.

What is the purpose? This quote from the article gives it away: “Police accused Pakistan’s intelligence agency of planning those attacks”. This is reinforced by the fact that the 1993 attack they keep mentioning was carried out by an organized crime syndicate that was led by an =ISI asset. The ISI has been made the prime suspect in this crime. They were, without a doubt, involved, but the agenda here is to make it look as if Pakistan-backed terrorists are behind the attacks. This will serve as a pretext for US incursions into Pakistan.

We know that the agenda is to create pretexts for US incursions into Pakistan. How? The Marriott Hotel Blast. The blast was a failed GlobIntel operation designed to wipe out a large number of civilian/military officials. The following quote from Bloomberg lets us know why the Marriott Hotel Blast happened:

The attack, which killed at least 53 and injured 266 near the capital’s main government buildings, came hours after President Asif Ali Zardari pledged to resist recent incursions into Pakistani territory by U.S. forces in Afghanistan who are battling Pakistan-based Taliban and al-Qaeda guerrillas. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=206…Qvmg&refer=home

This was the same reason that Bhutto was set up. She was a Harvard-educated member of the elite. She was 100% controlled opposition. Her controllers set her up, though, by having her return to Pakistan, where she was taken out by a professional sniper. This psychological operation achieved the desired effect.. destabilization. That’s the game that is being played.

Well, up until now.

The Bhutto Assassination and the Marriott Hotel Bombing were meant to destabilize Pakistan, so US/NATO forces will have a reason to go into it. This latest attack appears to be an effort to create the impression that now terrorism is not just inside Pakistan, but that it is slipping outside and is a danger to everyone else. Now, of course, the knights in shining armor must ride into Pakistan to fight the terrorism. They’ll be done putting it down in, say, maybe 10 years.. or maybe 50. Make it 100. How’a’bout ‘Never’?

With the Marriott Hotel Bombing, Bhutto Assassination, and India Attack, we are seeing “Northwoods 2008: Target Pakistan” playing out in front of our eyes. Of course, one of the agencies assisting in this game-plan is none other than Pakistan’s own ISI. Welcome to the real world, Joebob. No, you can’t stay asleep for five more minutes.

-LT

Navy boarding suspicious ship off Mumbai

Nov 27, 2008

MUMBAI, India – The Indian navy says its forces are boarding a cargo vessel suspected of ties to the Mumbai attacks that killed 101 people.

Navy spokesman Capt. Manohar Nambiar said Thursday that the ship, the MV Alpha, had recently come to Mumbai from Karachi, Pakistan.

Nambiar says the navy has “located the ship and now we are in the process of boarding it and searching it.” He gave no other details on the ship.

More than 100 people were killed and 300 injured when suspected Islamic militants attacked 10 sites in Mumbai.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081127/ap_on_…pdqVk7X0Bes0NUE

NY warns of possible al Qaeda attack

U.S. authorities have warned of a possible al Qaeda threat to transit systems in and around New York City, a Homeland Security official said on Wednesday.

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE4AP5U220081126

New York Alert Based on Possible Al-Qaeda Planning

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the FBI issued a joint warning to state and local officials yesterday about a possible al-Qaeda plot to attack the New York subways, a DHS spokeswoman said.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=a8tDkQA20kvI

L.A. tightens security after New York’s terrorism alert

The report of a threat of terrorist violence against the New York transit system has prompted Los Angeles officials to increase security.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2008/11/that-report-of.html

The death of India’s Anti-Terror chief is a huge indication that this was a fraud attack. Why? This guy was very skeptical of the “Islamic Terrorism”. So skeptical that his investigations provided a reason for the perps to want him knocked off.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Is_Purohit_the_man_who_knows_too_much/articleshow/3762368.cms

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/ats-disappointed-over-sadhvi/390911/

It seems the chief was chasing the wrong patsies. Instead of joining in on the “Islamic Terrorism” meme, he was going after “Hindu Terrorists”.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/29_September_2008_western_India_bombings#Malegaon_blasts
http://www.ndtv.com/convergence/ndtv/story.aspx?id=NEWEN20080074233

You may say “Well, how could the establishment have targeted him in the middle of the raging attack that they created?”. Did you hear how he died? He died from three shots in the chest. This indicates he could have easily been and was probably targeted. One early report said that he could have been shot by the police. The following quote is quite revealing: “His death is likely to affect the probe into the Malegaon blast.”.
http://ibnlive.in.com/news/ats-chief-hemant-karkare-killed–his-last-pics/79133-3.html

What’s going around now is that the gunmen singled out people with American/British passports and specifically targeted westerners. Why, then, are there so few American/British casualties out of the 101 known victims? Looks to me like that story was fabricated to upset people.

This is a 100% fraud attack. Just watch them pin it all on “ISI-backed terrorists” and “Pakistan-tied groups”. Of course, the anti-terror cop who didn’t buy the “Islamic fundamentalism” myth got knocked off in the attack by what was almost certainly a deliberate assassination on the part of authorities.

Here’s the “911” number again:

“MUMBAI, India (Nov. 27) – Indian commandos fought Thursday to wrest control of two luxury hotels and a Jewish center from suspected Muslim militants, a day after a chain of attacks across Mumbai left at least 119 people dead and the city shellshocked.”

http://news.aol.com/article/india-seeks-answers-after-terror-attacks/261363?icid=200100397x1214336480x1200925708

That’s important. Notice that ‘119’ isn’t the actual number. It’s the ‘at least’ number. When the media says ‘at least’, ‘more than’, ‘up to’, etc. they then put one of their numbers next. It’s code.

This big story of the ‘massacre against the ‘west and israel’ hits our faces – in media- on ’27’ 11, ie, 7+2=9/11, and the ‘estimates of victims also pointing to that infamous number.

Clues point to domestic terrorists in India attack

By PAISLEY DODDS – 2 days ago

LONDON (AP) — The attack on India’s financial capital bears all the trademarks of al-Qaida — simultaneous assaults meant to kill scores of Westerners in iconic buildings — but clues so far point to homegrown Indian terrorists, global intelligence officials said Thursday.

Spy agencies around the world were caught off guard by the deadly attack, in which gunmen sprayed crowds with bullets, torched landmark hotels and took dozens of hostages.

“We have been actively monitoring plots in Britain and abroad and there was nothing to indicate something like this was about to happen,” a British security official told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of his work.

Britain is the former colonial power in India and Pakistan and closely monitors terrorist suspects in those countries.

In some ways, the attack illustrated just how fluid terror tactics have become since Sept. 11 — and how the threat has become more global.


The group that claimed responsibility, Deccan Mujahideen, was unknown to global security officials. The name suggested the group was Indian.

One of the suspects reportedly called an Indian television station, speaking the main Pakistani language of Urdu, to demand the return of Muslim lands.


But Ajai Sahni, head of the New Delhi-based Institute for Conflict Management who has close ties to India’s police and intelligence, said the attack was a departure from past assaults waged over Kashmir.

a U.S. counterterrorism official said on condition of anonymity, referring to Pakistani militant groups linked to al-Qaida who have fought Indian troops in Kashmir.

Another British security official told the AP on condition of anonymity…

Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh blamed “external forces” but stopped short of blaming Pakistan. Both are nuclear-armed countries.

“This type of terrorism is spreading, through Pakistan and now India, but we were all surprised by such a large-scale attack like this,” said Wajid Hassan, Pakistan’s High Commissioner in London. “This is no coincidence that this type of attack happened so soon after the bombing of the Marriott Hotel. People from all countries are being paid to fight this al-Qaida war. This is a war that goes beyond any nationality.”

“It’s a possibility,” Sahni said. “When we say Mumbai underworld we’re talking of Dawood Ibrahim.

Ibrahim is one of India’s most wanted men and also the alleged mastermind behind bombings in Mumbai in 1993 that killed 257 people. He has reportedly fled Mumbai, and police now believe he lives in Pakistan. Pakistani officials have denied this.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i0k30wCYJX61fidvPJmS78x7mhzgD94NPJN80

Born – December 26, 1955 (1955-12-26) (age 52) Ratnagiri, Maharashtra India
Residence – India-Mumbai
Occupation – Drug smuggler, Money launderer, Underworld Don, Crime Boss, Terrorist

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawood_Ibrahim

Let’s dig through this article, written by a reporter for the CFR-controlled Associated Press.

-The report states that the attack bears all of the hallmarks of Al-CIAda. This is false.

-This report says that ‘scores of westerners’ were targeted, despite the fact that only a few westerners were among the casualties.

-Anonymous British spooks have been ‘informing’ AP about the attack.

-Britain has been ‘closely monitoring’ terrorism in India.

-The attack has ‘illustrated’ the threat of global terrorism.

-Pakistan’s High Commissioner in London believes there is a link between the Marriott blast and the India attack (No shit!).

-A number of ‘clues’ point to Pakistan (Will this attack be the one that brings in the US/NATO crew?)

This article confirms an MI6 role in the attack. Britain is part of the G8, it has been ‘closely monitoring’ terrorism in both India and Pakistan, and anonymous British spooks have been providing AP with their information.

Britain says no evidence so far to suggest India attackers were British citizens

Earlier reports alleged at least one of the gunmen could have been a British-born Pakistani. But a Foreign Office spokeswoman, who spoke on condition of anonymity because she was not authorized to speak to the press, said none of the attackers identified so far was British.

http://www.startribune.com/world/35213559.html?elr=KArks:DCiUBcy7hUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUU

1. One of them was reported to be British-born, huh? The MI6 role is looking more and more probable.

2. A government spokeswoman with no name/face. That’s someone we can trust.

3. Why isn’t she authorized to speak to the press?

4. ‘So far’? Doesn’t sound very conclusive to me.

Then again, this might be a trap. “British-born Pakistani” may have us jump and say “I wonder if this raises the possibility of an MI6 link?!” before spreading it to people who will not focus on “British-born” but rather on “Pakistani”. The perps are known to hide disinformation inside what appear to be revelations. For an example of this, see the ISI-Atta $100,000 story.

Bush Assures Help to India After Terrorist Attack

President Bush called Prime Minister Manmohan Singh of India Sunday morning to express solidarity and offer condolences over the deadly terrorist attacks in Mumbia, a White House spokesman said.

Noting that American citizens were also killed, Bush told Singh that he would be working with the international community to provide all the necessary help in the investigation of the attacks, White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe said.

The attacks, which killed at least 174 people, including 18 foreigners, in India’s financial capital, ended Saturday when commandos killed the last three gunmen inside a luxury hotel.

Bush told Singh that he has directed the State and Defense Departments along with other federal agencies to devote the necessary resources and personnel to the situation, Johndroe said.

Bush told Singh he believes this tragedy can create an opportunity “to hold these extremists accountable and demonstrate the world’s shared commitment to combat terrorism,” Johndroe said.

FBI agents arrived in India on Sunday. A second group of investigators was on alert to join the first team if necessary. The State Department warned U.S. citizens still in the city that their lives remain at risk.

On Saturday, Bush pledged full U.S. support to India in a brief statement at the White House after returning from the Camp David presidential retreat where he spent Thanksgiving and monitored the rampage. Bush said the killers “will not have the final word.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2008/11/30/bush-assures-help-india/

Wuh-oh! FBI spooks have arrived to help ‘investigate’ the attack. Not good. The killers “won’t have the final word”, huh? Sounds like the US is gearing up for war. Target? Pakistan. Watch as the heroic FBI, working with Indian authorities, ‘uncovers’ Pakistani links to the attacks.

It’s very revealing that Bush told Singh that the attack ‘creates an opportunity’ to ‘demonstrate’ the ‘world’s shared committment’ in the “War on Terror”. That remark just stunk up the room.

Bush Pledges Aid to India After ‘Violent, Brutal’ Mumbai Attack

By Roger Runningen

Nov. 30 (Bloomberg) — President George W. Bush pledged full U.S. support to India after the 60-hour siege of Mumbai killed hundreds, including at least six Americans, in the bloodiest assault in the South Asian nation in 15 years.

“The killers who struck this week are brutal and violent, but terror will not have the final word,” Bush said yesterday as returned to the White House after spending Thanksgiving at Camp David in Maryland. India “can count on the world’s oldest democracy to stand by their side.”

The president conferred on the attacks with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and his national security advisers in a secure video conference at Camp David, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said. U.S. Ambassador to India David Mulford in New Delhi also participated in the 7:30 a.m. Washington time call.

At least 195 people died in the attacks on the Taj Mahal Palace and Tower and Oberoi-Trident hotels, a Jewish center, a railway station and a restaurant, said S Jadhav, an official at the Mumbai’s disaster management unit. More than 295 people were injured in attacks that ended early yesterday, Mumbai time.

Six Americans died in the carnage, and an unknown number are missing, Mulford said. India, with 1 billion people, is the world’s largest democracy.

“We pledge the full support of the United States as India investigates these attacks, brings the guilty to justice and sustains its democratic way of life,” Bush said in a statement on the South Lawn of the White House.

Bush on Oct. 8 enacted a law that lets U.S. companies such as General Electric Co. sell atomic fuel and technology to India’s burgeoning energy sector for the first time in three decades. The U.S.-India Civil Nuclear Cooperation Agreement lifts a ban on supplying fuel to the world’s largest democracy, imposed after India tested an atomic bomb 34 years ago.

Bush, Obama Contacts

Throughout the siege, the president said he was in contact with President-elect Barack Obama to share information on developments in Mumbai, as U.S. authorities worked “to ensure that American citizens in India are safe.”

Obama called Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh late Nov. 28 to offer condolences. “He told the prime minister that there is one president at a time, but that he would be monitoring the situation closely,” said Nick Shapiro, an Obama spokesman, in an e-mailed statement.

Bush said Indians are “resilient” and “strong,” and have built a multiethnic democracy that “can withstand this trial.” Mumbai, the financial capital, will bounce back and “continue to be the center of commerce and prosperity.”

Improved Ties

Nuclear-armed India and Pakistan have sought improved relations since 2003, a year after they came close to fighting a fourth war since the countries were formed. The two countries are in talks on issues including control of the disputed Himalayan territory of Kashmir, commercial cooperation, terrorism and drug trafficking.

Bush made no comment on whether the U.S. was concerned about the potential for increased tensions between the two nuclear-armed South-Asian neighbors, nor did he elaborate about the kind of the U.S. may be offering.

Perino said in response to a question that she couldn’t be specific about whether the FBI is helping authorities in India with the investigation. “We’ve offered assistance, and that’s all we can say for now,” she said in an e-mail.

“As the people from the world’s largest democracy recover from these attacks, they can count on the world’s oldest democracy to stand by their side,” the president said.

While more than 300 people have died in attacks on Indian markets, mosques and theaters this year, the indiscriminate killing of businessmen and tourists in five-star hotels marks an escalation in the country’s fight again Islamic extremism. Singh will convene an all-party meeting today to seek support for a nationwide agency mirroring the Federal Bureau of Investigation to probe terror-related attacks.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a_DYUprPgbRE&refer=home

Looks like the FBI is tight-lipped about their role in the investigation. I wonder why that is. rolleyes.gif

It’s interesting that a US-India policy that has gone unchanged for 30 years involving the energy cartel changed a month before the attack happened. Anyone else find that to be a little too coincidental?

November 25, 2008

9/11 MAVs ?


http://angelsfortruth.com/Military%20Orbs.html

The Micro Air Vehicle (MAV) Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) developed a
backpackable, fully autonomous, vertically launched-and-landed ducted fan UAV capable of
providing electro-optical or infrared hover-and-stare support to the dismounted Soldier.
The MAV air vehicle is small (less than 14-inch duct outer diameter), flies autonomously,
has an endurance of 55 minutes at sea level, and can operate at altitudes over 10,000 feet.
These capabilities make it ideal for operations in the complex/urban terrain and extreme
conditions typical of restricted military environments.
http://www.darpa.mil/Docs/DARPA2007Strateg…inalMarch14.pdf

Knowing how the U S Government violates privacy laws using the excuse of “security”,
what caught my attention is that Honeywell markets their MAV for urban civilian use as well.
http://www.honeywell.com/sites/aero/Surfac…8CBB5BDECF7.htm

So when will Nano Air Vehicles be spying on us?

DARPA NANO AIR VEHICLE PROGRAM
The objectives of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Nano Air
Vehicle (NAV) program are to develop and demonstrate an extremely small (less than 7.5 cm
wingspan), ultra-lightweight (weighing less than 10 grams) air vehicle system with the potential
to perform indoor and outdoor military missions in challenging environments.
The initial 18-month phase of the program ended in spring of 2008. During the first
phase, four contractors, AeroVironment Inc., Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Lockheed Martin
Advanced Technology Laboratories, and MicroPropulsion Corp., developed technologies for lift
generation and vehicle control via rotating and flapping wings, advanced stability and control
using video images, and analytical tools for developing low Reynolds number aircraft. The
contractors also conducted trade studies, risk mitigation testing and demonstrations, and
completed preliminary designs of their vehicle concepts.

Based on the results of the initial phase, DARPA selected AeroVironment to continue
developing its Nano Air Vehicle design. The continuing design effort by AeroVironment, which
will be completed in less than six months, will focus on further development of critical aspects of
their flapping wing concept. If this additional development work is successful, DARPA will
start an 18-month detailed design effort that will conclude with prototype system fabrication and
flight demonstrations.

“The NAV program will push the limits of aerodynamic and power conversion
efficiency, endurance and maneuverability for very small air vehicle systems,” explained Dr.
Todd Hylton, DARPA program manager. “We are interested in a system that has 20 minutes of
flight time, can withstand 2.5 meters per second wind gusts, can operate inside buildings and
have up to a kilometer command and control range.” In addition, the vehicle would be able to
hover and deliver a two-gram payload inside a building.

(Biological warfare? Two grams of weaponized anthrax have been shown to contain as many
as two trillion spores which, theoretically, could cause about 200 million deaths. Dr. Todd Hylton
is the DARPA Nano Air Vehicle project manager. He is also project manager for the Self
Decontaminating Surfaces Program and the Biological Sensory Structure Emulation Program.)

DARPA NANO AIR VEHICLE PROGRAM- May 2008
http://www.arpa.mil/Docs/NAV_fact_sheet_Ma…07180945041.pdf

Todd Hylton, Ph.D.
http://www.darpa.mil/dso/personnel/hylton.htm

AmandaReconWith
http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=5690&view=findpost&p=15295010

9/11 – SIMCITY 2001 Virtual Reality.

TV’s 9/11 simulated lanscapes of Manhattan were necessary to control all aspects of the real-life events unfolding – and not only the ‘planecrash’ scenes. The ‘explosive-rigged towers’ might have popped here and there and that would not have been good for TV viewers to see. The moving backgrounds/foregrounds, etc… are only a part of the many tell-tale signs of the manipulations going on. One may wish to focus only on the most blatant proof of video doctoring and just go with an Occam’s razor exposé. After all, the planecrash shots are by now ALL proven fakes. The layering issue may not be as blatant or as easily grasped as the various color schemes, maskings and swiveling choppers with static backdrops – but it certainly merits due attention. Let me provide a few samples – judge for yourself…

Frames from SEPTEMBER CLUES H

The two shots below are from FOX and NBC. Before even thinking ‘perspectives’, one has to keep in mind these are two rival TV Networks. What odds for them to have such similar vantage points ?

The next two shots are from FOX and ABC. Again, before even thinking ‘perspectives’, one has to keep in mind these are two rival TV Networks. What odds for them to have such similar vantage points ?

The next two frames are from ABC during the 1st tower collapse – only seconds apart (the entire backdrop is seen moving pretty swiftly on video, laterally AND vertically).

The next two shots are courtesy of the BBC, broadcast just as you see them in the frame below : two videos side by side: one yellow and the other black/white… Note the Verrazzano bridge in the background, considerably different in size and position – at the same moment in time – and hardly from very diverse camera angles…

The CNN broadcasts – which featured no helicopter shots (mostly only Aaron Brown reporting from a ‘rooftop’) – didn’t show us the Jersey shore backdrop at all ! This was probably a ‘wise’ idea as it could have provided a static basis of comparison which might have exposed the FOX/NBC/ABC ‘chopper’ shots and their various perspective problems.

Below, Simon compares a (low-res) TOURIST PICTURE with a CNN shot
It is unlikely that any difference in vantage point (height) would account for the Jersey shore to disappear completely on CNN. Judge by yourself.

Let us keep focused on what, IMHO, the main questions of this debate should be :
(1) : “Are the 9/11 live broadcasts otherwise normal footage with animation planes added on top”
or

(2) : “Are the 9/11 live broadcasts for the most part composed with digital renderings of the landscape”

Simon’s reasoning for ruling out hypothesis (1) is :

– no satisfactory explanation for the various ‘pastel’ color schemes. Top range broadcast cameras have ISO standard automatic white balance settings for daylight conditions.

– no satisfactory explanation for the plastic, cartoon-like texture of the landscapes conspicuously evident even in the highest archive resolution footage available.

– no satisfactory explanation for the ‘mask linings’ seen around buildings in a wide range of shots. No explanation for observed black/transparent ghost contours.

– at least 4 newschoppers were allegedly in the air, yet all seem to be hovering roughly in the same area (views almost always from Northern vantage points). The few shots we have (ABC) of a chopper sweepingly circling and filming from South never catches any of the other choppers supposedly hovering in the airspace North of the towers.

– virtually all choppers seen in the 9/11 broadcasts simply zap by at sustained speed from one side of the screen to the other. No newschoppers, to be sure…

– some of the alleged NBC chopper shots have the towers swaying alarmingly, causing TV anchors to wonder aloud if the towers are leaning… That pendulum movement is precisely what gyroscopic cameras are designed to impede.

-some of the alleged ABC chopper shots show the chopper landing gear rotating in front of camera lens while the NY scenery remains perfectly static.

– perspective problems with foregrounds/backgrounds (and disappearing backdrops) not reasonably explainable by cinematic dollyzoom special effects. Newschoppers are supposed to and will film aerial sceneries in normal fashion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolly_zoom

There’s much more one could add to this list of observations, but let’s try an Occam’s razor-style argumentation to rationalize the entire issue :

WHAT ODDS FOR 4 MAJOR (rival) TV NETWORKS TO FEATURE AERIAL/ROOFTOP VIEWS, ALL STRIKINGLY SIMILAR BUT FOR THEIR (bizarre) COLOR SCHEMES ?

NBC aerial view of Manhattan

ABC aerial view of Manhattan

FOX

CNN rooftop view of Manhattan

In the light of these observations, hypothesis (2) appears to be the most reasonable and logical conclusion :

The 9/11 live broadcasts were composed with digital renderings of the landscape – in all likelyhood by a central command / TV op-centre such as : http://www.scl.cc

Color schemes were tweaked to convey the illusion of ‘diversity’ between (what was meant to represent) the images of 5 major TV networks.

-The NBC TV archive shot is 14 seconds before the 2nd strike.
-The “In Memoriam” shot’s timeline is unknown – but we’ll soon see why it doesn’t matter.

We have 4 boats. Let’s give them names :
A = Ace
B= Bob
C= Cargo
J = Jolly

Now as you can see, the “In Memoriam” shot shows Bob quite a bit further ahead while Cargo and Jolly disappear from view. So far, so good. We may assume the 14 seconds to the 2nd strike are now down to X (?) seconds.

The problem is…we also have the infamous, non-archive, home-recorded NBC shot (which hardly shows anything at all – only a fuzzy streak diving into the tower). But as the exit hole explodes, this is what we observe : Ace – Bob – Cargo & Jolly are all there ! Note their respective positions.

Of particular and crucial interest is that Cargo is in a position where it certainly should be visible in the “Memoriam” shot. But it is not. It’s long gone.

So how did that happen ? Anyone familiar with video (or audio) multitrack editing will know how easily tracks may slip out of synch (with each other) if you’re moving markers on a set timeline. The “In Memoriam” docu was likely a re-edit of old material used on 9/11. They ran the background images ‘faster’ than the foreground images (buildings) – which have also been rotated more than the originals : As a matter of fact, that particular angle of view (slightly more to the left of the towers) was NEVER SEEN on 9/11 and is nowhere to be seen in the NBC archives. All this may seem complex to the layman but unfortunately that is what all this research is about. Blood sweat and tears .

FOXED OUT part2 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9LURV-joLI
( the “JIM and BOB” comparison towards the end of the video)

If you want to read up on how fake imagery is morphed together, you can do that in the Air Force’s seminal Information Warfare paper by Stein.

http://ics.leeds.ac.uk/papers/vp01.cfm?outfit=pmt&folder=66&paper=493

The backdrop was removed from some of the 9-11 videos shown on TV. That’s a proven fact. Why was it removed? To hide evidence…

Many of the “boats” and “helicopters” and “birds” and “people” and “helicopter skis” are just art assets that the perps overlaid onto other images. They’re not any different from the monsters running back and forth on screen in a video game.

Many of the 9-11 videos are montages of various elements. It’s the most common type of fakery around. Read “The Commissar Vanishes”. These days, the montage process has even been automated and commercialized.

http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1400181.1400202&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE


http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html#MSNBC_Live

Notice the weird “wobbling” in this short video clip gif as it pans to the left as the “plane” is seen flying down before disappearing behind the WTC before the feed is switched to a different angle.

Full video show more “wobbling” and “zoom clues”:





– all 5 depict the same moment in time
– all 5 are full-frontal views of the twin towers
– all 5 are set in different sceneries – and vastly different colors
– all 5 are, consequently, shot from 5 different cameras
– all 5 are thus aligned on the same axis, whether they be shot

from helicopters, rooftops or, as some folks want to explain it,
“a much lower vantage point” (Matrix number 1…)

– 4 out of the 5 show a minuscule blob passing between the towers – which is not ‘falling debris’ as stated in the Anthony Lawson/Nick Irving debunking efforts of the first version of Sept Clues. I have shown that the blob is synched to the ‘airplane’ motion.

You may not rate Simon Shack as a serious researcher and He does not want to be wasting anyone’s ‘precious time’. However, as a man of common sense, Simon asks us to use our own judgement to explain to how these 5 shots may have occured in the Real World.

YURI FAKTOROVICH is a russian pilot who purportedly flew by the 9/11 crime scene (North to South) in his little Cessna aircraft.

Grabbing his camera (this is how the official story goes), this is what he shot through his window as he approached Manhattan :

As we crop YURI’s picture, we get this pretty familiar view : a coincidence, of course.
(Note the Verrazzano bridge, always perfectly aligned…)

But our friend YURI also shot 3 more pictures as he drove his little Cessna past the 9/11 crime scene..

Funnily enough, his last picture failed to capture any of the many TV choppers filming the crime scene…Oh wait, maybe your fine eye will FIND ONE !

THE 9/11 ABC broadcast (btw 8:53 and 9:12AM)

ABC’s broadcast starts off with this watercolor view of the towers. Now let’s assume for now these are all REAL images taken from ABC’s Chopper7. All right ?
ABC at 8:53

ABC at 8:54 ( This tripod shot from East is briefly aired a couple of times)

ABC at 8:58 : Chopper 7 catches one of several choppers seen in the 9/11 broadcasts which almost invariably zap by as if they had some more urgent matters to tend to…

ABC at 8:59 : Chopper7 is now proceeding in southwestern direction around the towers ( its gyroscopic camera evidently, shall we say, malfunctioning…)

ABC at 9:00 Chopper 7 is now full west of the WTC : it catches another chopper, perhaps the only slowly hovering chopper that we may find on all the 5 TV networks that morning. Hey, could it be NBC’s Chopper 4 ?..

ABC at 9:01 : Chopper 7 is now south of the towers (still on the western side).

ABC at 9:02 : Now – in less than a minute – Chopper7 is back northwest of the towers (which get locked into position to prepare for the cartoon strike).

At roughly the same time, another camera locks into position (see picture at right) only seconds before the ‘airplane’ strike.

ABC at 9:03 : Airliner animation zaps by and disappears behind towers.

ABC at 9:03+ : Chopper 7’s camera (awkwardly placed between the well-focused ‘legs’ of the chopper) slickly ‘pulls’ the towers into center of picture. No doubt, a camera with many special features…

ABC at 9:05 : Now, chopper 7’s camera pulls off another trick : its gyroscopic system actually compensates for the direction changes of its carrier! One could also applaud the depth of field of the camera which focuses with ease both close-up and distant fields.

ABC at 9:08 : Chopper7 is now back to a (north-westerly) airspace much nearer to the towers than a few minutes ago. Those chopper skids still getting in the way…although in a less annoying manner. The image is darker than ever.

ABC at 9:08 + : Now this is when things start to get interesting : the live TV feed abruptly switches from the dark shot to another bright-green, washed-out image which seems to be from another chopper altogether. Did ABC have not one, but TWO choppers in the air ? This is not a replay – nothing in the broadcast suggests this is meant to be anything else than continuous and unedited live footage.

ABC at 9:09 : After a while, the bright-green shot (from a chopper clearly in another position) switches back again to the darker images of chopper7 … or which is which ? What’s going on ?

ABC at 9:12 : Finally, we are graced with this infamous shot.
Compare it to the colors and brightness of the 1st picture at 8:53…

Please note : Chopper 7 at NO time leaves the western/north-western area of the scenery. How YURI FAKTOROVICH (see previous post in this thread) failed to catch NBC’s Chopper4, ABC’s Chopper7 (or the phantom 2nd ABC chopper) as he flew by in his Cessna is quite a mystery…

Conclusions : the burden of proof lies with those who claim these are authentic images filmed by TV choppers. We now understand more about the 9/11 plan : it was principally based around a media-backed mass illusion. Along a logical line of reasoning, we can reach to a conclusion dictated by plain, deductive common sense : little or no parts of the real-life events were supposed to be aired on television. It was way too great a risk – and a rather silly one to take given the means and technology available. We are looking at computer-generated imagery. By definition, such images are not real – they are false.

TWO FAST FLY-BY CHOPPERS IN THE HAZE

The Russian Cessna pilot ‘YURI FAKTOROVICH’, by contrast, offered us some of the best resolution pictures of the crime scene available. If choppers were hovering around the place , they would certainly be visible. But there’s none.
Now let’s have another look at Yuri’s first and last (of 4) pictures :

YURI’S SHOT ARRIVING AT THE SCENE ( about 9:01 ?)

YURI’S SHOT DEPARTING THE SCENE ( about 9:04 ? )

In my ABC chronology 8:53 – 9:12 (see my previous post) I have showed that ABC’s ‘Chopper7’ hovers southwest of the towers at 9:01 . Chopper7 never leaves the west-northwest-southwest airspace around the towers. If it is 5 miles away – as you say – ‘Chopper7’ should certainly not be hidden by the smoke…

Now, as you must know (if you’ve done your homework as a serious researcher), NBC’s ‘Chopper4’ filmed ‘Flight175’s crash with an almost head-on view of the towers, after which it started drifting westwards too. Here it is at around 9:06. Does it look like a shot taken from 5 miles away ? Note that ‘remarkable’, superfast zoom-in just as that chopper-skid again swishes in front of the camera … ( The shot on the right is the direct continuation of the sequence, just to show that what obscures the camera is indeed the chopper skid…)

NBC at around 9:06

The ‘beauty’ of this research is that we can use our own eyes to make progress towards determining whether what we were shown on Tv on 9/11 was real or not.

Let us check out what happened around the collapse of WTC2.
We will compare a clip from the Camera Planet archives with a clip from NBC.

-Clip at left is from CameraPlanet at the time of the WTC2 collapse :

-Clip at right is a replay from NBC (Matt Lauer’s voiceover goes : “Don’t know if this is the correct tape…”)

Of course, these GIF files Simon is posting here are small : I hope you will take his word for the fact that the chopper seen on CameraPlanet (which takes a Northwestern direction at start of collapse) is not seen at anytime on NBC (on my fullscreen, high-res version).

Now, let’s see who have released these 2 clips :

This is the ‘mission statement’ of the CameraPlanet archive :
http://video.google.com/911anniversary.html

“What began as a search for footage for a single film has turned into a world-wide resource for filmmakers, historians, and scientists. The CameraPlanet Archive is the world’s largest single collection of video recorded on and around attacks on the World Trade Center.”

NBC is one of the major US TV networks and as such, I believe, needs no introduction…

So, I ask you : who are you going to call to ask for a clarification : NBC or CameraPlanet ? Both ? Should we wait for Shure aka Jeff Hill to do this for us or are we going to do something about it ?

We are not looking for a BLACK chopper that flies BEHIND the smoke BEFORE the collapse (and disappears thereafter) such as the one you posted :

We are looking for a WHITE chopper that flies IN FRONT of the towers (and well clear of the smoke) AFTER the collapse.

Besides, if we are to apply the wondrous “911 TV footage chromatic standards” to your black chopper, it should turn white if it flew in front of the smoke !…

Chopper2 apparently shot the WTC2 collapse from south. FOX5 apparently aired that shot too :

Here’s what is said in the CBS studio : Over 30seconds after the collapse, JIM SMITH (who apparently is inside Chopper2) reports : “…..it appears that the top portion of the building has collapsed down to the streets below…”

http://www.septclues.com/CBS%20chopper2%20…JIM%20SMITH.aif

Now , yet again, it’s anyone’s guess where Chopper2 might be in these pictures…

Jim Smith is one of at least four TV people who report “…the top portion of the building has collapsed” – sometimes long after it is evident the whole tower has been blown to fine dust.

Something flew out the other side, this is what they were trying to hide.

-SparkOfLife/SimonShack

November 24, 2008

A series of large physical changes in our solar system

This is from a paper that was published in the late 90s by a Russian Scientist named Dr. Alesky Dimitrov.

The following processes are taking place on the distant planets of our Solar System. But they are, essentially speaking, operationally driving the whole System.

Here are examples of these events:

1.1.1 A growth of dark spots on Pluto [7].

1.1.2 Reporting of auroras on Saturn [8].

1.1.3 Reporting of Uranus and Neptune polar shifts (They are magnetically conjugate planets), and the abrupt large-scale growth of Uranus’ magnetosphere intensity.

1.1.4 A change in light intensity and light spot dynamics on Neptune [9,10].

1.1.5 The doubling of the magnetic field intensity on Jupiter (based upon 1992 data), and a series of new states and processes observed on this planet as an aftermath of a series of explosions in July 1994 [caused by “Comet” SL-9] [12]. That is, a relaxation of a plasmoid train [13,14] which excited the Jovian magnetosphere, thus inducing excessive plasma generation [12] and it’s release in the same manner as Solar coronal holes [15] inducing an appearance of radiation belt brightening in decimeter band (13.2 and 36 cm), and the appearance of large auroral anomalies and a change of the Jupiter – Io system of currents [12, 14].

Update Note From A.N.D Nov. 1997:
A stream of ionized hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, etc. is being directed to Jupiter from the volcanic areas of Io through a one million amperes flux tube. It is affecting the character of Jupiter’s magnetic process and intensifying it’s plasma genesis.{Z.I.Vselennaya “Earth and Universe” N3, 1997 plo-9 by NASA data}

1.1.6 A series of Martian atmosphere transformations increasing its biosphere quality. In particularly, a cloudy growth in the equator area and an unusual growth of ozone concentration[16].

Update Note: In September 1997 the Mars Surveyor Satellite encountered an atmospheric density double that projected by NASA upon entering a Mars orbit. This greater density bent one of the solar array arms beyond the full and open stop. This combination of events has delayed the beginning of the scheduled photo mission for one year.

1.1.7 A first stage atmosphere generation on the Moon, where a growing natrium atmosphere is detected that reaches 9,000 km in height. [17].

1.1.8 Significant physical, chemical and optical changes observed on Venus; an inversion of dark and light spots detected for the first time, and a sharp decrease of sulfur-containing gases in its atmosphere [16].

http://www.tmgnow.com/repository/global/planetophysical1.html
http://www.tmgnow.com/repository/global/planetophysical.html

Again, this guy’s credentials are:

Professor of Geology and Mineralogy, and Chief Scientific Member,
United Institute of Geology, Geophysics, and Mineralogy,
Siberian Department of Russian Academy of Sciences.
Expert on Global Ecology, and Fast -Processing Earth Events.

November 13, 2008

Truth about the Leafs

Larry Tanenbaum Chairman of Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment atteneded Cornell University.

Tanenbaum hired Ken Dryden to become the president of the Toronto Maple Leafs in 1997. Dryden Attended Cornell University, where he also played hockey until his graduation in 1969. He has also received honorary doctoral degrees from Saint Mary’s University At Cornell, he was a member of the Sigma Phi Society and vice-president of the Quill and Dagger society. Quill and Dagger is often recognized as one of the most prominent collegiate societies of its type, along with Skull and Bones of Yale University.

The next year Dryden hired Pat Quinn and Quinn became head coach in 1998. Quinn attended Widener University, Widener was was known as Pennsylvania Military College after 1892, and adopted the Widener name in 1972. Quinn also attended University of San Diego USD is a Roman Catholic university in California.

Steve Stavro, the owner of Maple Leaf Gardens, became chairman and majority owner of MLSE, of which Tanenbaum was a minority partner. In 2006, Stavro died in his home at age 78 after a heart attack. He was adorned with icons of many of his achievements including the Knights of Malta, Order of the Masons and an equestrian statue of Alexander the Great.

Tanenbaum became non-executive chairman of MLSE in 2003. Under the new ownership structure the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP) became the majority shareholder based on equity.

The Ontario Teachers Pension Plan is one of Canada’s largest institutional investors having reported $108 billion in net assets on December, 31, 2007. The OTPP maintains a prominent role as one of Canada’s largest investors, owning investments across Canada. Through its fully owned subsidiary Toronto Eaton Centre. He was made a Knight Bachelor in 1915 in recognition of his participation in the war effort, and so became Sir John Craig Eaton, and his wife, Lady Flora McCrea Eaton. This refers to a man who has been knighted by the monarch but not as a member of one of the organised Orders of Chivalry.

A few seasons later Quinn continued as head coach but was succeeded as General Manager by
John Ferguson, Jr. He played his college hockey at Providence College where he served as an assistant captain. Providence is an interdenominational Christian Liberal Arts College. Ferguson then attended Suffolk University Law School, Suffolk is a private law school in downtown Boston. Suffolk is the fourth largest law school in the United States, and only Harvard and Georgetown have a larger enrollment amongst eastern law schools.

November 4, 2008

Obama 100% Fraud

Filed under: 9/11, Mind Control, PSYOPS, Spark Of Life Truth — Tags: — master @ 9:59 pm

obamafraud1

His most senior foreign advisor wrote the book ‘The Grand Chessboard’ which was a foundation plan for 9/11, he wrote it in 1997, he was also on the PNAC group (plan for a new american century) the guy’s name is Zigmond Brzezinski who funded the Taliban in the 70s under Jimmy Carter and was one of the masterminds behind the CIA counter-intelligence group known as Al-Quida.

Systematic Demolition of WTC (exo-nuke + DEW thesis)

October 31, 2008

Oct 30th – Truth in 7 Minutes W/ Markus Allan – Chad Andrews – ‘Lord Tsukasa’ – Alix MacMillan ‘Spark Of Life’

Truth in 7 Minutes W/ Markus Allan, Chad Andrews, \'LT\' & Alex (SparkOfLife)

Older Posts »

Blog at WordPress.com.