Spark Of Life Media

December 4, 2008

Moon Landing Fakery


The NSA probably was on the moon since the 1950s. And the Apollo missions were a cover for what was really going on.

Now some skeptics will mention things like ‘Mythbusters’ and other television programs owned by Viacom and General Electric as ‘proof’ that the Apollo Moon Landing images were infact NOT fake.

Myth Buster is produced by BBC ? BBC did a story on 9/11, it was a total smear campaign. If you actually think your gonna find even the slightest bit of truth from Cable television, you are out of your element.

Mythbuster is 100% juvenille.
Their science, if there ever is any, is so full of holes. They obviously try to alter the outcomes of half of their tests. I can tell that they want to prove a myth correct if they use things like “controls”, but they get most of their fans by debunking myths, so when they drop things like the controls for some simpletons tests that do not account for half of the variables, then you know within 120 seconds of the stories start that they will prove the myth “busted” at the end.

For people who claim they love science, watching a show hosted by two special effects guys that ignores all base scientific technique in 90% of the cases, mythbusters fans seem to be eager to ignore science, for the reward that a TV show said that other people are loony.

The proof is in the pudding if you know ANYTHING about photography you will be amazed to see the amount of evidence provided that every image they showed us of the moon landing was a composite fake.

1. Shadows do not run parallel.

2. Identical Backgrounds, this is impossible.

3. The earth is 8 times the diameter of the moon. This image should be bigger. Also, it’s as if some kind of moon atmosphere exists, the earth would not look like this from the moon.


It seems on the moon that Shadows do crazy things like ignore white.
This is impossible.

I also didn’t know that Buzz Aldrin was 8ft’ tall, but that seems to have to be the case in this photo.

Notice how his head is 100% aligned with the horizon.

Same here, directly through the horizon. This is impossible.

The NASA images made the horizon black because they couldn’t show what was on the moon. Beyond the black are structures and probably vehicles that they couldn’t show, so they blacked them out.

If you actually think this is what the moon looks like, please go do a test and line your head up 100% with the horizon. Even on Earth it is impossible.

There are a number of operations going on, on the moon.
This is some kind of reactor, what people on the inside call ‘Alternative 3’

The depiction of NASA’s view of how moon bases would look in a 1958 issue of National Geographic is in fact exactly what they actually built on the moon in February1958. When Kennedy said “we are
going to send men to the moon,” part of the US Military – the NSA – was already there.

The moon is an artificial object in space. The moon is the only object in all of KNOWN space that does not rotate. It is like a vehicle parked in space which is EXACTLY what it is.

Some people claim that the technology in the 1950s was no sufficient enough to make it to the moon.

1. The cold war was a hoax, it was put together to make it look like the Russians and US were enemies when in fact they were the closest of allies.

The $5 Trillion Cold War Hoax
http://www.whale.to/b/mullins6.html

2. Now your saying that the military didn’t have that kind of technology in that era, that is just a SILLY thing to claim. The NAZI’s utilized Anti-Gravity aircrafts.

Nazi Germany claimed the territory of New Swabia in Antarctica, sent an expedition there in 1938, and planned others.

Nazi Germany conducted research into advanced propulsion technology, including rocketry, Viktor Schauberger’s turbine research, and the Arthur Sack A.S.6 experimental “flying disc”.

Some UFO sightings during World War II, particularly those known as foo fighters, were thought to be enemy aircraft.

Free-Energy existed since the late 1930s. They brought it to the moon in the 50s.
Technology advances so fast, the average human being is probably 100 years behind what actual secret technology can do.

There is raw photographic evidence and testimony of people who have been involved in the creation of NAZI anti-gravity space vehicles.




Advertisements

November 25, 2008

9/11 – SIMCITY 2001 Virtual Reality.

TV’s 9/11 simulated lanscapes of Manhattan were necessary to control all aspects of the real-life events unfolding – and not only the ‘planecrash’ scenes. The ‘explosive-rigged towers’ might have popped here and there and that would not have been good for TV viewers to see. The moving backgrounds/foregrounds, etc… are only a part of the many tell-tale signs of the manipulations going on. One may wish to focus only on the most blatant proof of video doctoring and just go with an Occam’s razor exposé. After all, the planecrash shots are by now ALL proven fakes. The layering issue may not be as blatant or as easily grasped as the various color schemes, maskings and swiveling choppers with static backdrops – but it certainly merits due attention. Let me provide a few samples – judge for yourself…

Frames from SEPTEMBER CLUES H

The two shots below are from FOX and NBC. Before even thinking ‘perspectives’, one has to keep in mind these are two rival TV Networks. What odds for them to have such similar vantage points ?

The next two shots are from FOX and ABC. Again, before even thinking ‘perspectives’, one has to keep in mind these are two rival TV Networks. What odds for them to have such similar vantage points ?

The next two frames are from ABC during the 1st tower collapse – only seconds apart (the entire backdrop is seen moving pretty swiftly on video, laterally AND vertically).

The next two shots are courtesy of the BBC, broadcast just as you see them in the frame below : two videos side by side: one yellow and the other black/white… Note the Verrazzano bridge in the background, considerably different in size and position – at the same moment in time – and hardly from very diverse camera angles…

The CNN broadcasts – which featured no helicopter shots (mostly only Aaron Brown reporting from a ‘rooftop’) – didn’t show us the Jersey shore backdrop at all ! This was probably a ‘wise’ idea as it could have provided a static basis of comparison which might have exposed the FOX/NBC/ABC ‘chopper’ shots and their various perspective problems.

Below, Simon compares a (low-res) TOURIST PICTURE with a CNN shot
It is unlikely that any difference in vantage point (height) would account for the Jersey shore to disappear completely on CNN. Judge by yourself.

Let us keep focused on what, IMHO, the main questions of this debate should be :
(1) : “Are the 9/11 live broadcasts otherwise normal footage with animation planes added on top”
or

(2) : “Are the 9/11 live broadcasts for the most part composed with digital renderings of the landscape”

Simon’s reasoning for ruling out hypothesis (1) is :

– no satisfactory explanation for the various ‘pastel’ color schemes. Top range broadcast cameras have ISO standard automatic white balance settings for daylight conditions.

– no satisfactory explanation for the plastic, cartoon-like texture of the landscapes conspicuously evident even in the highest archive resolution footage available.

– no satisfactory explanation for the ‘mask linings’ seen around buildings in a wide range of shots. No explanation for observed black/transparent ghost contours.

– at least 4 newschoppers were allegedly in the air, yet all seem to be hovering roughly in the same area (views almost always from Northern vantage points). The few shots we have (ABC) of a chopper sweepingly circling and filming from South never catches any of the other choppers supposedly hovering in the airspace North of the towers.

– virtually all choppers seen in the 9/11 broadcasts simply zap by at sustained speed from one side of the screen to the other. No newschoppers, to be sure…

– some of the alleged NBC chopper shots have the towers swaying alarmingly, causing TV anchors to wonder aloud if the towers are leaning… That pendulum movement is precisely what gyroscopic cameras are designed to impede.

-some of the alleged ABC chopper shots show the chopper landing gear rotating in front of camera lens while the NY scenery remains perfectly static.

– perspective problems with foregrounds/backgrounds (and disappearing backdrops) not reasonably explainable by cinematic dollyzoom special effects. Newschoppers are supposed to and will film aerial sceneries in normal fashion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolly_zoom

There’s much more one could add to this list of observations, but let’s try an Occam’s razor-style argumentation to rationalize the entire issue :

WHAT ODDS FOR 4 MAJOR (rival) TV NETWORKS TO FEATURE AERIAL/ROOFTOP VIEWS, ALL STRIKINGLY SIMILAR BUT FOR THEIR (bizarre) COLOR SCHEMES ?

NBC aerial view of Manhattan

ABC aerial view of Manhattan

FOX

CNN rooftop view of Manhattan

In the light of these observations, hypothesis (2) appears to be the most reasonable and logical conclusion :

The 9/11 live broadcasts were composed with digital renderings of the landscape – in all likelyhood by a central command / TV op-centre such as : http://www.scl.cc

Color schemes were tweaked to convey the illusion of ‘diversity’ between (what was meant to represent) the images of 5 major TV networks.

-The NBC TV archive shot is 14 seconds before the 2nd strike.
-The “In Memoriam” shot’s timeline is unknown – but we’ll soon see why it doesn’t matter.

We have 4 boats. Let’s give them names :
A = Ace
B= Bob
C= Cargo
J = Jolly

Now as you can see, the “In Memoriam” shot shows Bob quite a bit further ahead while Cargo and Jolly disappear from view. So far, so good. We may assume the 14 seconds to the 2nd strike are now down to X (?) seconds.

The problem is…we also have the infamous, non-archive, home-recorded NBC shot (which hardly shows anything at all – only a fuzzy streak diving into the tower). But as the exit hole explodes, this is what we observe : Ace – Bob – Cargo & Jolly are all there ! Note their respective positions.

Of particular and crucial interest is that Cargo is in a position where it certainly should be visible in the “Memoriam” shot. But it is not. It’s long gone.

So how did that happen ? Anyone familiar with video (or audio) multitrack editing will know how easily tracks may slip out of synch (with each other) if you’re moving markers on a set timeline. The “In Memoriam” docu was likely a re-edit of old material used on 9/11. They ran the background images ‘faster’ than the foreground images (buildings) – which have also been rotated more than the originals : As a matter of fact, that particular angle of view (slightly more to the left of the towers) was NEVER SEEN on 9/11 and is nowhere to be seen in the NBC archives. All this may seem complex to the layman but unfortunately that is what all this research is about. Blood sweat and tears .

FOXED OUT part2 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9LURV-joLI
( the “JIM and BOB” comparison towards the end of the video)

If you want to read up on how fake imagery is morphed together, you can do that in the Air Force’s seminal Information Warfare paper by Stein.

http://ics.leeds.ac.uk/papers/vp01.cfm?outfit=pmt&folder=66&paper=493

The backdrop was removed from some of the 9-11 videos shown on TV. That’s a proven fact. Why was it removed? To hide evidence…

Many of the “boats” and “helicopters” and “birds” and “people” and “helicopter skis” are just art assets that the perps overlaid onto other images. They’re not any different from the monsters running back and forth on screen in a video game.

Many of the 9-11 videos are montages of various elements. It’s the most common type of fakery around. Read “The Commissar Vanishes”. These days, the montage process has even been automated and commercialized.

http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1400181.1400202&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE


http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html#MSNBC_Live

Notice the weird “wobbling” in this short video clip gif as it pans to the left as the “plane” is seen flying down before disappearing behind the WTC before the feed is switched to a different angle.

Full video show more “wobbling” and “zoom clues”:





– all 5 depict the same moment in time
– all 5 are full-frontal views of the twin towers
– all 5 are set in different sceneries – and vastly different colors
– all 5 are, consequently, shot from 5 different cameras
– all 5 are thus aligned on the same axis, whether they be shot

from helicopters, rooftops or, as some folks want to explain it,
“a much lower vantage point” (Matrix number 1…)

– 4 out of the 5 show a minuscule blob passing between the towers – which is not ‘falling debris’ as stated in the Anthony Lawson/Nick Irving debunking efforts of the first version of Sept Clues. I have shown that the blob is synched to the ‘airplane’ motion.

You may not rate Simon Shack as a serious researcher and He does not want to be wasting anyone’s ‘precious time’. However, as a man of common sense, Simon asks us to use our own judgement to explain to how these 5 shots may have occured in the Real World.

YURI FAKTOROVICH is a russian pilot who purportedly flew by the 9/11 crime scene (North to South) in his little Cessna aircraft.

Grabbing his camera (this is how the official story goes), this is what he shot through his window as he approached Manhattan :

As we crop YURI’s picture, we get this pretty familiar view : a coincidence, of course.
(Note the Verrazzano bridge, always perfectly aligned…)

But our friend YURI also shot 3 more pictures as he drove his little Cessna past the 9/11 crime scene..

Funnily enough, his last picture failed to capture any of the many TV choppers filming the crime scene…Oh wait, maybe your fine eye will FIND ONE !

THE 9/11 ABC broadcast (btw 8:53 and 9:12AM)

ABC’s broadcast starts off with this watercolor view of the towers. Now let’s assume for now these are all REAL images taken from ABC’s Chopper7. All right ?
ABC at 8:53

ABC at 8:54 ( This tripod shot from East is briefly aired a couple of times)

ABC at 8:58 : Chopper 7 catches one of several choppers seen in the 9/11 broadcasts which almost invariably zap by as if they had some more urgent matters to tend to…

ABC at 8:59 : Chopper7 is now proceeding in southwestern direction around the towers ( its gyroscopic camera evidently, shall we say, malfunctioning…)

ABC at 9:00 Chopper 7 is now full west of the WTC : it catches another chopper, perhaps the only slowly hovering chopper that we may find on all the 5 TV networks that morning. Hey, could it be NBC’s Chopper 4 ?..

ABC at 9:01 : Chopper 7 is now south of the towers (still on the western side).

ABC at 9:02 : Now – in less than a minute – Chopper7 is back northwest of the towers (which get locked into position to prepare for the cartoon strike).

At roughly the same time, another camera locks into position (see picture at right) only seconds before the ‘airplane’ strike.

ABC at 9:03 : Airliner animation zaps by and disappears behind towers.

ABC at 9:03+ : Chopper 7’s camera (awkwardly placed between the well-focused ‘legs’ of the chopper) slickly ‘pulls’ the towers into center of picture. No doubt, a camera with many special features…

ABC at 9:05 : Now, chopper 7’s camera pulls off another trick : its gyroscopic system actually compensates for the direction changes of its carrier! One could also applaud the depth of field of the camera which focuses with ease both close-up and distant fields.

ABC at 9:08 : Chopper7 is now back to a (north-westerly) airspace much nearer to the towers than a few minutes ago. Those chopper skids still getting in the way…although in a less annoying manner. The image is darker than ever.

ABC at 9:08 + : Now this is when things start to get interesting : the live TV feed abruptly switches from the dark shot to another bright-green, washed-out image which seems to be from another chopper altogether. Did ABC have not one, but TWO choppers in the air ? This is not a replay – nothing in the broadcast suggests this is meant to be anything else than continuous and unedited live footage.

ABC at 9:09 : After a while, the bright-green shot (from a chopper clearly in another position) switches back again to the darker images of chopper7 … or which is which ? What’s going on ?

ABC at 9:12 : Finally, we are graced with this infamous shot.
Compare it to the colors and brightness of the 1st picture at 8:53…

Please note : Chopper 7 at NO time leaves the western/north-western area of the scenery. How YURI FAKTOROVICH (see previous post in this thread) failed to catch NBC’s Chopper4, ABC’s Chopper7 (or the phantom 2nd ABC chopper) as he flew by in his Cessna is quite a mystery…

Conclusions : the burden of proof lies with those who claim these are authentic images filmed by TV choppers. We now understand more about the 9/11 plan : it was principally based around a media-backed mass illusion. Along a logical line of reasoning, we can reach to a conclusion dictated by plain, deductive common sense : little or no parts of the real-life events were supposed to be aired on television. It was way too great a risk – and a rather silly one to take given the means and technology available. We are looking at computer-generated imagery. By definition, such images are not real – they are false.

TWO FAST FLY-BY CHOPPERS IN THE HAZE

The Russian Cessna pilot ‘YURI FAKTOROVICH’, by contrast, offered us some of the best resolution pictures of the crime scene available. If choppers were hovering around the place , they would certainly be visible. But there’s none.
Now let’s have another look at Yuri’s first and last (of 4) pictures :

YURI’S SHOT ARRIVING AT THE SCENE ( about 9:01 ?)

YURI’S SHOT DEPARTING THE SCENE ( about 9:04 ? )

In my ABC chronology 8:53 – 9:12 (see my previous post) I have showed that ABC’s ‘Chopper7’ hovers southwest of the towers at 9:01 . Chopper7 never leaves the west-northwest-southwest airspace around the towers. If it is 5 miles away – as you say – ‘Chopper7’ should certainly not be hidden by the smoke…

Now, as you must know (if you’ve done your homework as a serious researcher), NBC’s ‘Chopper4’ filmed ‘Flight175’s crash with an almost head-on view of the towers, after which it started drifting westwards too. Here it is at around 9:06. Does it look like a shot taken from 5 miles away ? Note that ‘remarkable’, superfast zoom-in just as that chopper-skid again swishes in front of the camera … ( The shot on the right is the direct continuation of the sequence, just to show that what obscures the camera is indeed the chopper skid…)

NBC at around 9:06

The ‘beauty’ of this research is that we can use our own eyes to make progress towards determining whether what we were shown on Tv on 9/11 was real or not.

Let us check out what happened around the collapse of WTC2.
We will compare a clip from the Camera Planet archives with a clip from NBC.

-Clip at left is from CameraPlanet at the time of the WTC2 collapse :

-Clip at right is a replay from NBC (Matt Lauer’s voiceover goes : “Don’t know if this is the correct tape…”)

Of course, these GIF files Simon is posting here are small : I hope you will take his word for the fact that the chopper seen on CameraPlanet (which takes a Northwestern direction at start of collapse) is not seen at anytime on NBC (on my fullscreen, high-res version).

Now, let’s see who have released these 2 clips :

This is the ‘mission statement’ of the CameraPlanet archive :
http://video.google.com/911anniversary.html

“What began as a search for footage for a single film has turned into a world-wide resource for filmmakers, historians, and scientists. The CameraPlanet Archive is the world’s largest single collection of video recorded on and around attacks on the World Trade Center.”

NBC is one of the major US TV networks and as such, I believe, needs no introduction…

So, I ask you : who are you going to call to ask for a clarification : NBC or CameraPlanet ? Both ? Should we wait for Shure aka Jeff Hill to do this for us or are we going to do something about it ?

We are not looking for a BLACK chopper that flies BEHIND the smoke BEFORE the collapse (and disappears thereafter) such as the one you posted :

We are looking for a WHITE chopper that flies IN FRONT of the towers (and well clear of the smoke) AFTER the collapse.

Besides, if we are to apply the wondrous “911 TV footage chromatic standards” to your black chopper, it should turn white if it flew in front of the smoke !…

Chopper2 apparently shot the WTC2 collapse from south. FOX5 apparently aired that shot too :

Here’s what is said in the CBS studio : Over 30seconds after the collapse, JIM SMITH (who apparently is inside Chopper2) reports : “…..it appears that the top portion of the building has collapsed down to the streets below…”

http://www.septclues.com/CBS%20chopper2%20…JIM%20SMITH.aif

Now , yet again, it’s anyone’s guess where Chopper2 might be in these pictures…

Jim Smith is one of at least four TV people who report “…the top portion of the building has collapsed” – sometimes long after it is evident the whole tower has been blown to fine dust.

Something flew out the other side, this is what they were trying to hide.

-SparkOfLife/SimonShack

September 25, 2008

9/11 NPT Advertising Campaign

August 21, 2008

9/11 Truth ‘Molten Metal’ Theory = Disinfo.

Hydraulic Crane supposedly lifting molten metal from WTC Ground Zero

Hydraulic Crane supposedly lifting molten medal from WTC complex

The picture above, appears in Steven ‘Los Alamos’ Jones’ September 2006 report entitled ‘Why Indeed.’ The report also states that the photographer was one Frank Silecchia, and the picture was taken on September 27th 2001 according to the photographer’s aid.

Note that the close proximity between the ‘slag’ and the exposed hydraulics. The Jones’ paper states that the color of the solid metal slag indicates the temperature is over 845° C. However many mechanical engineering handbooks reveal that hydraulics fail at a fraction of the temperature.

Machinery Lubrication – “Hydraulic Equipment Reliability: Beyond Contamination Control”
“Hydraulic fluid temperatures above 82°C (180ºF) damage most seal compounds and accelerate oil degradation. A single overtemperature event of sufficient magnitude can permanently damage all the seals in an entire hydraulic system, resulting in numerous leaks. The by-products of thermal degradation of the oil (soft particles) can cause reliability problems such as valve-spool stiction and filter clogging.”

Machinery Lubrication – “ Symptoms of Common Hydraulic Problems and Their Root Causes”
“Fluid temperatures above 180°F (82°C) can damage seals and accelerate degradation of the fluid. This means that the operation of any hydraulic system at temperatures above 180°F is detrimental and should be avoided. Fluid temperature is too high when viscosity falls below the optimum value for the system’s components. The temperature at which this occurs is dependent on the viscosity grade of the fluid in the system and can be well below 180°F.”

Machine Design – “Predicting the life of hydraulic hose”
“Temperature range recommended for typical rubber hose spans about –40 to 212°F [212° F = 100° C]. Fluid or ambient temperatures outside these bounds impact service life. Plasticizers leach out of elastomers faster at high temperatures, though the rate depends on the actual temperature and duration. Heat-related failure is evident when the cover shows signs of hardening and cracking, and the hose shape takes on a permanent set.
Temperatures below recommended will also shorten service life. This problem is evident when the inner tube shows signs of stiffness and cracks. Specials are available for either extreme: Low-temperature hoses for service to –67°F and high-temperature versions for applications exceeding 300°F. [300° F = 149° C]”

If there was molten metal in the ruins below, the hydraulic systems in those orange grapplers would be destroyed.

A lesson in Hyrdaulic engineering.

When water comes in contact with molten metal,
the result is a steam explosion.

Associated Press excerpt:
“McCullough was driving a tow truck that was thrown into the air by the powerful geyser of steam.
He landed in the crater gouged out by the blast and suffered third-degree burns over 80 percent of his body.”

NYC, JULY 2007.

Wikipedia
“A dangerous steam explosion can be created when liquid water encounters hot, molten metal.
As the water explodes into steam, it splashes the burning hot liquid metal along with it,
causing an extreme risk of severe burns to anyone located nearby and creating a fire hazard.”

Now, one might ask. “What about the firefighters who claim to have actually seen molten metal?
Well perhaps the ‘9/11 perps’ performed PSYOPS suggesting that what they were seeing was molten metal. After such a horrific event, one might not wish to reflect on what they saw. So they latch on to the first answers they hear.


Zone F, the area in which the ‘molten metal, crane’ photo was taken, is the same area as this empty and damp hole in a FEMA picture filed 9/18/01. Where’s the molten metal?

Aswell, not only do hydraulic machines fair no chance against the heat of molten steel.
Human faces haven’t the slightest chance against it either.

This image was included in the Jones 2006 report. However he fails to properly source the photo. It is also clear upon further review that the photo is FAKE. If the orange color was real the workers’ skin would have melted completely off their faces. Dr. Jim Fetzer compares putting your face over a tea kettle, a mere 212F to a 1500+F orange image. Also notice that the workers are peering into the hole with flash lights. Kind of redundant right ?

Here is the real photo.

So what do they have to hide ? Don’t you think that if they really did use thermate they would do a much better job covering it up ? Well, the truth is that they are probably hiding what really happened with disinformation.

Notice the orange in the photo above, If that were a steam explosion, the driver of the grappler would be severely burned. But who ever heard of orange steam anyway? Take a look at the Solid Orange Slag picture and notice similar orange fumes. Dr Judy Wood suggest that these orange (rust fumes) are the result of molecular dissociation.

Guy Lounsbury – Member of New York Air National Guard’s 109th Air Wing:
National Guard Magazine article written by Lounsbury (excerpt): “One fireman told us that there was still molten steel at the heart of the towers’ remains. Firemen sprayed water to cool the debris down but the heat remained intense enough at the surface to melt their boots.”

If the temperature was hot enough to melt the firefighters’ boots,
their feet would have been incinerated.

Why did their feet not burn, but the metal of their boots ‘melted’ ?

Answer: Directed Energy Weapons & Molecular Dissociation.


REAL PICTURE, NO MOLTEN METAL

SOURCES:

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=91&Itemid=60

August 20, 2008

Toronto Explosion – TV-FAKERY ? (update)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wp7Q3cZeZk8 (watch video here)
1:00 – 1:10


1:07 – Completely out of focus


1:08 – Completely in focus. (satan on a horse, hind legs, dragon even ?)


1:09 – Completely out of focus.


They do it ALL THE TIME!

Blog at WordPress.com.